Abstract
With the use of spatial contextual cuing, we tested whether subjects learned to associate target locations with overall configurations of distractors or with individual locations of distractors. In Experiment 1, subjects were trained on 36 visual search displays that contained 36 sets of distractor locations and 18 target locations. Each target location was paired with two sets of distractor locations on separate trials. After training, the subjects showed perfect transfer to recombined displays, which were created by combining half of one trained distractor set with half of another trained distractor set. This result suggests that individual distractor locations were sufficient to cue the target location. In Experiment 2, the subjects showed good transfer from trained displays to rescaled, displaced, and perceptually regrouped displays, suggesting that the relative locations among items were also learned. Thus, both individual target-distractor associations and configural associations are learned in contextual cuing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., &Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,7, 66–80.
Baylis, G. C., &Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 145–162.
Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cuing of visual attention.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 170–178.
Chun, M. M., &Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.Cognitive Psychology,36, 28–71.
Chun, M. M., &Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation.Psychological Science,10, 360–365.
Chun, M. M., &Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 224–234.
Chun, M. M., &Phelps, E. A. (1999). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage.Nature Neuroscience,2, 844–847.
Hayhoe, M. (2000). Visual routines: A functional account of vision.Visual Cognition,7, 673–704.
]Irwin, D. E. (1992). Perceiving an integrated visual world. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention & performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 121–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jiang, Y., &Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 1105–1124.
Jiang, Y., Olson, I. R., &Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 683–702.
Keele, S. W., Hawkins, H. L. (1982). Explorations of individual differences relevant to high level skills.Journal of Motor Behavior,14, 3–23.
Levin, D. T., &Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 501–506.
Liu, J., Harris, A., &Kanwisher, N. (2002). Stages of processing in face perception: An MEG study.Nature Neuroscience,5, 910–916.
Mack, A., &Rock, I. (1998).Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of popout: I. Role of features.Memory & Cognition,22, 657–672.
Maljkovic, V., &Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of popout: II. The role of position.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 977–991.
Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures.Cognitive Psychology,19, 1–32.
Olson, I. R., &Chun, M. M. (2001). Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 1299–1313.
Olson, I. R., &Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context.Visual Cognition,9, 273–302.
O’Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology,46, 461–488.
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory.Psychological Bulletin,116, 220–244.
Pashler, H. (1998).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,29, 637–650.
Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 219–235.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,8, 368–373.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Shore, D. I., &Klein, R. M. (2000). The effects of scene inversion on change blindness.Journal of General Psychology,127, 27–43.
Thorpe, S., Fixe, D., &Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system.Nature,381, 520–522.
Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N., &Dahlen, K. (2000). Postattentive vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 693–716.
Yantis, S. (1992). Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization.Cognitive Psychology,24, 295–340.
Yantis, S. (1998). Control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 223–256). London: Psychology Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The present study is supported by a Helen Hay Whitney Research Fellowship.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, Y., Wagner, L.C. What is learned in spatial contextual cuing— configuration or individual locations?. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 454–463 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194893
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194893