Abstract
Confusion matrices were obtained for visual letter recognition and for tactual letter recognition with (1) the finger held stationary on small raised letters and (2) the finger allowed to scan them. In each sensory mode, performance was investigated at four letter sizes, with heights ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 min of arc for vision and from 3.0 to 8.0 mm for touch. The two tactual modes yielded similar recognition performance, although performance was always better in the scanned mode. For both vision and touch, performance appeared to be limited by primary receptor spacing. Letter heights corresponding to 50% correct identification (vision, 2.2 rain arc; scanned touch, 4 ram; static touch, 5 ram) spanned about five receptor spacings in each sensory system, indicating that the dimensional equivalence of vision and touch is determined by receptor spacing rather than central factors. The patterns of letter confusions and the productmoment correlations for correct identifications (vision vs. static touch, 0.83; vision vs. scanned touch, 0.75; and static touch vs. scanned touch, 0.89, all taken at comparable performance levels) imply that similar spatial processes are involved in the different modes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beyer, W. H.Handbook of tables for probability and statistics. Cleveland: The Chemical Rubber Co., 1976.
Campbell, F. W., &Green, D. G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.Journal of Physiology (London), 1965,181, 576–593.
Craig, J. C. A confusion matrix for tactually presented letters.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,26, 409–411.
Craig, J. C. Temporal integration of vibrotactile patterns.Perception & Psychophysics, 1982,32, 219–229.
Johansson, R. S., &Vallbo, A. B. Tactile sensibility of the human hand: Relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin.Journal of Physiology (London), 1979,286, 283–300.
Johnson, K. O. Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture discrimination.Federation Proceedings, 1983,42, 2542–2547.
Johnson, K. O., &Lamb, G. L. Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: Neural patterns evoked by Braille-like dot patterns in the monkey.Journal of Physiology (London), 1981,310, 117–144.
Johnson, K. O., &Phillips, J. R. Tactile spatial resolution: I. Two point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution and letter recognition.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1981,46, 1177–1191.
Krueger, L. E. David Katz’sDer Aufbau der Tastwelt (The world of touch): A synopsis.Perception & Psychophysics, 1970,7, 337–341.
Lamb, G. Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: Psychophysical performance measurements in humans.Journal of Physiology (London), 1983,335, 551–565. (a)
Lamb, G. Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: Peripheral neural coding in the monkey.Journal of Physiology (London), 1983,338, 567–587. (b)
Loomis, J. M. Interaction of display mode and character size in vibrotactile letter recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980,16, 385–387.
Loomis, J. M. On the tangibility of letters and braille.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,29, 37–46.
Loomis, J. M. Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices.Perception & Psychophysics, 1982,31, 41–52.
O’Brien, B. Vision and resolution in the central retina.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1951,41, 882–894.
Phillips, J. R., &Johnson, K. O. Tactile spatial resolution: II. Neural representation of bars, edges and gratings in monkey primary afferents.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1981,46, 1192–1203.
Rosenfeld, A., &Kak, A. C.Digital picture processing. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
Siegel, S.Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
Taenzer, J. C. Visual word reading.IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 1970,11, 44–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phillips, J.R., Johnson, K.O. & Browne, H.M. A comparison of visual and two modes of tactual letter resolution. Perception & Psychophysics 34, 243–249 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202952
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202952