Abstract
Previous studies have shown that the effect of concurrent nontempcraLprocessmg on time astimation may vary depending on the level of difficulty of the nontemporal task. This is commonly interpreted within the context of so-called distraction/interruption models of temporal processing, which propose that as concurrent task difficulty or complexity is increased, temporal processing receives less attention. We hypothesize that the effect of nontemporal processing does not depend on the level of difficulty as such, but rather on the extent to which the concurrent nontemporal task specifically involves processing in short-term meraery. Four experiments were run in which the short-term memory requirements of concurrent tasks were systematically varied, although all of the tasks were of comparable levels of difficulty. In the first experiment, the effect of memory search on simultaneous temporal productions was proportional to the number of items to search. As with reaction time, produced intervals were shown to increase linearly with the number of items in the memorized set. In Experiment 2, a visual search involving some load on short-term memory interfered in the same way with time production, although to a lesser extent. The last two experiments showed that performing attention-demanding visual search tasks that did not involve short-term memory did not lengthen simultaneously produced time inter-vals. This suggests that interference of nontemporal processing on time processing may not be a matter of nonspecific general purpose attentional resources, but rather of concurrent short-term-memory processing demands.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, R. C, Holmgren, J. E., &Juola, J. F. (1969). Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 321–326.
Block, R. A. (1990). Models of psychological time. In R. A. Block (Ed.),Cognitive models of psychological time(pp. 1–35) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, S. W. (1985). Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 115–124.
Brown, S. W., &West, A. N. (1990). Multiple timing and the allocation of attention.Acta Psychologica,75, 103–121.
Church, R. M. (1984). Properties of the internal clock. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan(Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 566–582) New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Fortin, C, &Rousseau, R. (1987). Time estimation as an index of processing demand in memory search.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 377–382.
Fraisse, P. (1984). Perception and estimation of time.Annual Review of Psychology,35, 1–36.
Frankenhauser, M. (1959).Estimation of time. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., &Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 52–77) New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Goldstone, S., &Goldfarb, J. L. (1963). Judgment of filled and unfilled durations: Intersensory factors,Perceptual & Motor Skills,17, 763–774.
Gopher, D.T. &Donchin, E. (1986). Workload: An examination of the concept. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol, 41, pp. 1–49) New York: Wiley.
Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., Gaes, G., &Bierman, K. (1977). Concurrent processing demands and the experience of time-in-passing.American Journal of Psychology,90, 431–446.
Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., &Kinsbourne, M. (1976). Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed.American Journal of Psychology,89, 719–730.
Kahneman, D. (1973),Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kantowitz, B. H. (1985). Channels and stages in human information processing: A limited analysis of theory and methodology.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,29, 135–174.
Kantowitz, B. H., &Knight, J. L. (1976). Testing tapping timesharing: II. Auditory secondary tasks.Acta Psychologica,40, 342–362.
Killeen, P. R., &Weiss, N. A. (1987). Optimal timing and the Weber function.Psychological Review,94, 455–468.
Kirk, R. E. (1982),Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Kristofferson, A. B. (1977). A real-time criterion theory of duration discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 105–117.
Mcclain, L. (1983), Interval estimation: Effect of processing demands on prospective and retrospective reports.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 185–189.
Meck, W. H. (1984). Attentional bias between modalities: Effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 528–541) New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Navon, D. (1984). Resources: A theoretical soup stone?Psychological Review,91, 216–234.
Navon, D., &Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human processing system.Psychological Review,86, 214–255.
Norman, D. A., &Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes.Cognitive Psychology,7, 44–64.
Rabbitt, P. (1984). The control of attention in visual search. In R. Parasuraman & D. T. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 273–291) New York: Academic Press.
Richards, W. (1973).Time reproductions by H.M. Acta Psychologica,37, 279–282.
Rousseau, R., Fortin, C, & Kirouac, E. (in press). Sensibilité et diagnosticité de la mesure de la charge mentale par la tâche secondaire de frappe cadencée.Revue Canadienne de Psychologie/Canadian Journal of Psychology.
Rousseau, R., Picard, D., &Pitre, E. (1984). An adaptive counter model for time estimation, in J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 639–642) New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Schweickert, R., &Boggs, G. J. (1984). Models of central capacity and concurrency.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,28, 223–281.
Scoville, W. B., &Milner, B, (1957). Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry,20, 11–21.
Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory.Science,153, 652–654.
Thomas, E. A. C, &Brown, I., Jr. (1974). Time perception and the filled-duration illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 449–458.
Thomas, E. A. C, &Cantor, N. E. (1978). Interdependence between the processing of temporal and non-temporal information. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 43–62) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Treisman, A., &Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 285–310.
Vroon, P. A. (1970). Effects of presented and processed information on duration experience.Acta Psychologica,34, 115–121.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1968). Sparing of short-term memory in an amnesic patient: Implications for strength theory of memory.Neuropsychologia,6, 235–244.
Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of processing resources. In R. Nickerson & R. Pew (Eds.),Attention and Performance VIII (pp. 239–257) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. T. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 63–102). New York: Academic Press.
Zakay, D. (1989). Subjective time and attentional resource allocation: An integrated model of time estimation. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.),Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective (pp. 365–397). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Zakay, D. (1990). The evasive art of subjective time measurement: Some methodological dilemmas. In R. A. Block (Ed.),Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 59–84) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zakay, D., Nitzan, D., &Glickson, J. (1983). The influence of task difficulty and external tempo on subjective time estimation.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 451–456.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grants OGP0046422 and A0692 from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada to the first and the second authors.
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211746.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fortin, C., Rousseau, R., Bourque, P. et al. Time estimation and concurrent nontemporal processing: Specific interference from short-term-memory demands. Perception & Psychophysics 53, 536–548 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205202
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205202