Abstract
This paper reports a series of experiments of the perceived position of the hand in egocentric space. The experiments focused on the bias in the proprioceptively perceived position of the hand at a series of locations spanning the midline from left to right. Perceived position was tested in a matching paradigm, in which subjects indicated the perceived position of a target, which could have been either a visual stimulus or their own fingertip, by placing the index finger of the other hand in the corresponding location on the other side of a fixed surface. Both the constant error, or bias, and the variable error, or consistency of matching attempts, were measured. Experiment 1 showed that (1) there is a far-left advantage in matching tasks, such that errors in perceived position are significantly lower in extreme-left positions than in extreme-right positions, and (2) there is a strong hand-bias effect in the absence of vision, such that the perceived positions of the left and right index fingertips held in the same actual target position in fact differ significantly. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that this hand-bias effect is genuinely due to errors in the perceived position of the matched hand, and not to the attempt at matching it with the other hand. These results suggest that there is no unifying representation of egocentric, proprioceptive space. Rather, separate representations appear to be maintained for each effector. The bias of these representations may reflect the motor function of that effector.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baud-Bovy, G., &Viviani, P. (1998). Pointing to kinesthetic targets in space.Journal of Neuroscience,18, 1528–1545.
Bisiach, E. (1993). Mental representation in unilateral neglect and related disorders.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psvchology,46A, 435–461.
Bowers, D., &Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effect of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task.Neuropsychologia,18, 491–498.
Bradshaw, J. L., Nettleton, N. C, Nathan, G., &Wilson, L. (1983). Head and body space to left and right, front and rear: II. Visuotactual and kinesthetic studies and left-side underestimation.Neuropsychologia,21, 475–486.
Ghilardi, M. F., Gordon, J., &Ghez, C. (1995). Learning a visuomotor transformation in a local area of work space produces directional biases in other areas.Journal of Neurophysiology,73, 2535–2539.
Head, H. (1920).Studies in neurology. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Helms-Tillery, S. I., Flanders, M., &Soechting, J. F. (1991). A coordinate system for the synthesis of visual and kinesthetic information.Journal of Neuroscience,11, 770–778.
Helms-Tillery, S. I., Flanders, M., &Soechting, J. F. (1994). Errors in kinesthetic transformations for hand apposition.Neuro Report,6, 177–181.
Jeannerod, M. (1988).The neural and behavioural organisation of goal-directed movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory.Neuropsychologia,9, 97–113.
Paillard, J. ( 1991 ).Brain and space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paillard, J., &Brouchon, M. (1968). Active and passive movement in the calibration of position sense. In S. J. (Ed.),The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior (pp. 35–55). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Pierson-Savage, J. M., &Bradshaw, J. L. (1987). Mapping of extracorporeal space by vibrotactile reaction times: A far-left-side disadvantage.Perception,16, 283–290.
Prablanc, C., Echallier, J. F., Komilis, E., &Jeannerod, M. (1979). Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target. I. Spatio-temporal characteristics of eye and hand movements and their relationships when varying the amount of visual information.Biological Cybernetics,35, 113–124.
Prablanc, C., Tzavaras, A., &Jeannerod, M. (1975). Adaptation of the two arms to opposite prism displacements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,27, 667–671.
Recanzone, G. H., Merzenich.M. M., Jenkins, W. M., Grajski, K. A., &Dinse, H. R. (1992). Topographie reorganization of the hand representation in cortical area 3b of owl monkeys trained in a frequency-discrimination task.Journal of Neurophysiology,67, 1031–1056.
Redding, G. M., &Wallace, B. (1996). Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 379–394.
Rossetti, Y., Tadary, B., &Prablanc, C. (1994). Optimal contributions of head and eye positions to spatial accuracy in man tested by visually directed pointing.Experimental Brain Research,97, 487–496.
van Beers, R. J., Sittig, A. C., &Denier Van Der Gon, J. (1996). How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information.Experimental Brain Research,111, 253–261.
von Hofsten, C, &Rosblad, B. (1988). The integration of sensory information in the development of precise manual pointing.Neuropsychologia,26, 805–821.
Wann, J. P. (1991). The integrity of visual-proprioceptive mapping in cerebral palsy.Neuropsychologia,29, 1095–2106.
Wann, J. P., &Ibrahim, S. F. (1992). Does limb proprioception drift?Experimental Brain Research,91, 162–166.
Werner, H., Wapner, S., &Bruell, J. H. (1953). Experiments on sensory-tonic field theory of perception: VI. Effect of position of head, eyes and of object on position of the apparent median plane.Journal of Experimental Psychology,46, 293–299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
—Accepted by previous editor, Myron L. Braunstein
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haggard, P., Newman, C., Blundell, J. et al. The perceived position of the hand in space. Perception & Psychophysics 62, 363–377 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205556
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205556