Abstract
A number of recent as well as classic ideas suggest that there are constraints and limits on the explanatory role that computational, mathematical, and neural net models of visual and other cognitive processes can play that have not been generally appreciated. These ideas come from mathematics, automata theory, chaos theory, thermodynamics, neurophysiology, and psychology. Collectively, these ideas suggest that the neural or cognitive mechanisms underlying many kinds of formal models are untestable and unverifiable. Models may be good descriptions of perceptual and other cognitive processes, but they cannotin principle be reductive explanations nor can we use them to predict behavior at the molar level from what we know of the neural primitives. This discussion is an effort to clarify the appropriate meanings of these models, not to dissuade workers from forging ahead in the modeling endeavor, which I acknowledge is progressing and is making possible our increasingly deep appreciation of plausible and interesting cognitive processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allman, J. (1981). Reconstructing of the evolution of the brain in primates through the use of comparative neurophysiological and neuroanatomical data. In E Armstrong & D. Falk (Eds.),Primate brain evolution: Methods and concepts (pp. 13–28). New York: Plenum.
Anderson, J. A (1968) A memory model utilizing spatial correlation functions.Kybernetik,5, 113–119.
Anderson, J. A. (1972). A stmple neural network generating an interactwe memoryMathematical Btosctences,14, 197–220.
Anderson, J. A., &Rosenfeld, E. (Eds.) (1988).Neurocomputing: Foundations of research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Barlow, H. B. (1972). Single units and sensation: A neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology.Perception,1, 371–394.
Barlow, H. B (1978). The effioency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns.Vision Research,18, 637–650.
Bennett, B. M., Hoffman, D. D., &Prakesh, C. (1989).Observer mechanics. San Diego: Academic Press.
Blum, H. F. (1951).Time’s arrow and evolunon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Umversity Press.
Braunstein, M. L., Hoffman, D. D., Shapiro, L. R., Andersen, G. J., &Bennett, B. M. (1987). Minimum points and views for the recovery of three-dimensional structure.Journal of Erperimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 335–343.
Churchland, P. S (1986).Neurophilosophy: Towarda unified science of the mind-brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, M. A., &Grossberg, S. (1983). Absolute stability of global pattern formation and parallel memory storage by competitive neural networks.Transacnons of the IEEE,SMC-13, 815–826.
Crutchfield, J. P., Farmer, J. D., Packard, N. H., & Shaw, R. S. (1986, December). Chaos.Scientific American, pp. 46–57.
Cummins, R. (1983).The nature of psychological explanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cutting, J E. (1986)Percept, on with aneyeformotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dennett, D. C (1981).Bratnstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dretske, F. (1988).Erplaining behavior: Reasons in a world of causes Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1979).What computers can’t do The limits of artificial intelligence (rev. ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Eddington, A. (1928).The nature of the physical world. New York AMS Press.
Edwards, P. (Ed.) (1967).The encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol 5) New York Collier Macmillan.
Farley, B. G, &Clark, W. A. (1954). Simulataon of a self-organizing system by a digital computerInstitute of Radio Engineers Transactions of Information Theory,4, 76–84.
Fodor, J. A. (1968).Psychological explanation. New York: Random House.
Gleick, S. (1987). New images of chaos that are stirring a science revolution.Smithsoman,18(9), 122–137.
Godel, K. (1962).On formally undecldable propositions. New York: Basic Books.
Grebogi, C., Ott, E, &Yorke, J. A. (1987). Chaos, strange attractors, and fractal basin boundaries in nonlinear dynamics.Science,238, 632–638.
Grossberg, S. (1968) Some nonlinear networks capable of learning a spatial pattern of arbitrary complexity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,59, 368–372.
Grossberg, S. (1969). On learning of spatiotemporal patterns by networks with ordered sensory and motor components.Studies in Applied Mathematics,49, 135–166.
Grossberg, S. (1982).Studtes of mind and brain: Neural principles of learning, perception, development, cognition, and motor control. Boston: Reidel.
Grossberg, S. (1988). Nonlinear neural networks. Principles, mechanisms, and architectures.Neural Networks,1, 17–61.
Haugeland, J. (Ed.) (1981).Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hawkins, R. D., &Kandel, E. R. (1984). Is there a cell-biological alphabet for simple forms of learning?Psychological Review,91, 375–391.
Helmholtz, H. von. (1968). Excerpts from Treatise on Physiological Optics (3rd ed). In R. M. Warren & R. P Warren (Eds.),Helmholtz on perception. Its physiology and development New York Wiley. (Original work published 1925)
Hofstadter, D. R. (1985).Metamagical themas: Questing for the essence of mind and pattern. New York: Basic Books.
Kaas, J. H. (1978). The organization of visual cortex in primates. In C. Noback (Ed.),Sensory systems of primates. New York: Plenum.
Koffka, K. (1935)Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Marr, D. (1982).Vision. San Francisco: W H Freeman.
Massaro, D. W. (1986) The computer as a metaphor for psychological inquiry: Considerations and recommendationsBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,18, 73–92.
Massaro, D W. (1988). Some criticisms of connectionlst models of human performance.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 213–234
McClelland, J L., Rumelhart, D. E., &The PDP Research Group (1986).Parallel distributed processing: Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moore, E. F. (1956). Gedanken-expenments on sequential machines In C E. Shannon & J. McCarthy (Eds.),Automata studies (pp. 129–153) Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Prigogine, I. (1980).From being to becoming San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Ratliff, F (1965).Mach bands: Quantitative studies on neural networks in the retina. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Ratliff, F., &Hartline, H. K (1959). The response of Limulus optic nerve fibers to patterns of illumination on the receptor mosaic.Journal of General Physiology,42, 1241–1255.
Rosenblatt, F. (1962).Theprinciples of neurodynamics Washington, DC Spartan Books.
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J L, &The PDP Research Group (1986)Parallel distributed processing. Vol 1. Foundations Cambridge, MA MIT Press
Sejnowski, T. J., Koch, K., &Churchland, P. S. (1988). Computational neuroscience.Science,241, 1299–1306.
Selfridge, O. G. (1959). Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. InMechamzanon of thought processes (Proceedings of a symposium held at the National Physics Laboratory, November 1958; pp. 513–526) London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Stockmeyer, L. J., & Chandra, A. K. (1979, May). Intrinsically difficult problems.Scientific Amerwan, pp. 140–159.
Teller, D. Y (1984). Linking propositions.Vision Research,24, 1233–1246
Uttal, W R (1975)An autocorrelation theory of form detectton. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Uttal, W. R. (1981).A taxonomy of visual processes. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
Uttal, W. R. (1988).On seeing forms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Uttal, W. R., Davis, N. S., Welke, C., &Kakarala, R. (1988). The reconstruction of static visual forms from sparse dotted samplesPerception & Psychophysics,43, 223–240.
Van Essex, D. C. (1985). Functional orgamzation of primate visual cortex In A. Peters & E. G. Jones (Eds.),Cerebral cortex (Vol. 3, pp. 259–329) New York: Plenum.
Widrow, B. (1962). Generalization and information storage in networks of Adaline neurons. In M. C. Yovits, G. T. Jacobi & H. Goldstein (Eds.),Self-organizing systems. Washington, DC: Spartan Books
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by Contract N00014-88-K0603 from the Office of Naval Research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uttal, W.R. On some two-way barriers between models and mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics 48, 188–203 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207086
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207086