Abstract
In letter-identification reaction time experiments, a redundant-signals advantage was obtained when one location contained an irrelevant letter on single-target trials. It was not obtained when the position was blank. This confirms a prediction from a previous analysis in terms of variable criterion theory. The intercept of the linear function relating the growth of excitatory strength for redundant targets to that for the sum of single-target strengths is determined by the presence or absence of an irrelevant distractor. This confirms a second prediction. In this task, the redundant-signals advantage is due to distraction from an irrelevant stimulus occupying a relevant location. There is also evidence for a smaller distraction effect even from a redundant target. These findings are inconsistent with predictions of separate activation theory. Apparent differences be-tween these results and those of tachistoscopic recognition experiments are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eriksen, C. W. (1966). Independence of successive inputs and uncorrelated error in visual form perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology,72, 26–35.
Eriksen, C. W., &Lappin, J. S. (1965). Internal perceptual system noise and redundancy in simultaneous inputs in form identification.Psychonomic Science,2, 351–352.
Eriksen, C. E., &Shultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 249–263.
Grice, G. R., Canham, L., &Boroughs, J. M. (1984). Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 451–463.
Grice, G. R., Canham, L., &Schafer, C. (1982). Development of associative and perceptual interference.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 375–387.
Grice, G. R., Spiker, V. A., &Nullmeyer, R. (1979). Variable criterion analysis of individual differences and stimulus similarity in choice reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 353–370.
Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.Cognitive Psychology,14, 247–279.
Raab, D. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences,24, 574–590.
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics.Psychological Bulletin,86, 446–461.
Santee, J. L., &Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,8, 489–501.
Smith, E. E. (1968). Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions.Psychological Bulletin,69, 77–110.
Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.Journal of Experimental Psychology,88, 354–360.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grice, G.R., Canham, L. & Gwynne, J.W. Absence of a redundant-signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics 36, 565–570 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207517
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207517