Abstract
In the absence of definitive cues’to distance, the perceived distance of an object will be in error in the direction of the object appearing at a distance of about 2 m from O. This tendency to perceive an object at a relatively near distance is termed the specific distance tendency (Gogel. 1969). Also, it has been found that an error in perceiving the distance of an object will result in an apparent movement of the object when the head is moved (Hay & Sawyer. 1969; Wallach, Yablick. & Smith. 1972). From these two results, it was expected that the direction of trie apparent movement of a stationary point of light resulting from head movement would vary predictably as a function of the physical distance of the point of light from O. This expectation was confirmed in an experiment in which both the perceived motion and perceived distance of the point of light were measured. The consequences of the study for the role of motion parallax in the perception of distance and for the reafference principle in the perception of object motion with head motion are discussed
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eriksson, E. S. Movement parallax and distance perception. Report 117. University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden, 1972.
Gogel, W. C. The measurement of perceived size and distance. In W. D. Neff (Ed.).Contributions to sensory physiology. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, 1968.
Gogel, W. C. The sensing of retinal size. Vision Research, 1969, 9, 3–24. or]Gogel, W. C. Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance. American Journal of Psychology. 1972, in press.
Gogel, W. C. & Stürm, R. D. Directional separation and the size cue to distance. Psychologische Forschung, 1971, 35, 57–80.
Graham, C. H. Visual space perception. In C. H. Graham (Ed.).Vision and visual perception. New York: Wiley, 1965. Chap. 18.
Gyr, J. W. Is a theory of direct visual perception adequate? Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 77, 246–261.
Hay, J. C. & Sawyer, S. Position constancy and binocular convergence. Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 5, 310–312. or]Helmholtz, H. von. Helmholtz’s treatise on physiological optics. (Translated and edited from the 3rd German ed. by J. P. C. Southall) Vol. 3.The perception of vision. The Optical Society of America, 1925. 295 pp.
Hill, A. L. Direction constancy. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 11, 175–178.
Mack, A. An investigation of the relationship between eye and retinal image movement in the perception of movement. Perception & Psychophysics, 1970, 8, 291–298.
Ogle, K. N.Researches in binocular vision. Philadelphia and London: Saunders. 1950.
Posin, R. L. Perceptual adaptation to contingent visual-Field movement: An experimental investigation of position constancy. Doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University, 1966. (As discussed by I. Rock inThe nature of perceptual adaptation. New York: Basic Books, 1966.)
Rock, I.The nature of perceptual adaptation. New York: Basic Books, 1966.
Wallach, H., & Frey, K. J. Adaptation in the constancy of visual direction measured by a one-tnal method. Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 5, 249–252.
Wallach, H., & Frey, K. J. Adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 11, 77–83.
Wallach, H., Frey, K. J., & Bode, K. A. The nature of adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 11, 110–116.
Wallach, H., & Kravitz, J. H. The measurement of the constancy of visual direction and of its adaptation. Psychonomic Science, 1965a, 2, 217–218.
Wallach, H., & Kravitz, J. H. Rapid adaptation in the constancy of visual direction with active and passive rotation. Psychonomic Science, 1965b, 3, 165–166.
Wallach, H., Yablick, G. S., & Smith, A. Target distance and adaptation in distance perception in the constancy of visual direction. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 11, 3–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This investigation was supported by PHS Research Grant NS 08883 from the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke. The authors wish to thank Robert E. Newton for his help in the collection and analysis of the data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gogel, W.C., Tietz, J.D. Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency. Perception & Psychophysics 13, 284–292 (1973). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214141
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214141