Abstract
In chronometric research, it is well-known that many response devices used with personal computers, especially computer keyboards, suffer from measurement inaccuracies due to infrequent polling. In this article, it is investigated whether it is worth being concerned by this added error, given that human performance inherently exhibits a considerable degree of variability. By comparing inaccuracy due to response device imprecision with the level of variability already present in human performance, it is shown that the former is very unlikely to have a negative impact on statistical outcomes. In other words, millisecond resolution of response devices, although desirable, is not a general requirement.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, D. (1997). Universal serial bus system architecture. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes (W. G. Koster, Trans.). Acta Psychologica, 30, 412–431. (Original work published 1868)
Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249–263.
Forster, J. C. (2007). DMDX updates page. Retrieved December 4, 2008, from www.u.arizona.edu/~jforster/dmdx.htm.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
Howell, D. C. (2008). Fundamental statistics for the behavioral sciences (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Jordan, L. E., & Churchill, B. (1990). Communications and networking for the IBM PC and compatibles (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
Keele, S. W. (1972). Attention demands of memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 245–248.
Kenney, J. F., & Keeping, E. S. (1962). Mean absolute deviation. In Mathematics of statistics: Part 1 (3rd ed., pp. 76–77). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Kouider, S., & Dupoux, E. (2004). Partial awareness creates the “illusion” of subliminal semantic priming. Psychological Science, 15, 75–81.
Lacouture, Y., & Cousineau, D. (2008). How to use MATLAB to fit the ex-Gaussian and other probability functions to a distribution of response times. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 35–45.
Lincoln, C. E., & Lane, D. M. (1980). Reaction time measurement errors resulting from the use of CRT displays. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 55–57.
Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McGill, W. J. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 309–360). New York: Wiley.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234.
Plant, R. R., Hammond, N., & Turner, G. (2004). Self-validating presentation and response timing in cognitive paradigms: How and why? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 291–303.
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461.
R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at www.R-project.org.
Sanders, A. F., & Lamers, J. M. (2002). The Eriksen flanker effect revisited. Acta Psychologica, 109, 41–56.
Taylor, J. R. (1997). An introduction to error analysis: The study of uncertainties in physical measurements (2nd ed.). Sausalito, CA: University Science Books.
Ulrich, R., & Giray, M. (1989). Time resolution of clocks: Effects on reaction time measurement: Good news for bad clocks. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 42, 1–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Note—Accepted by the previous editorial team, when John H. Krantz was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Damian, M.F. Does variability in human performance outweigh imprecision in response devices such as computer keyboards?. Behavior Research Methods 42, 205–211 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.205
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.205