Abstract
A tool that is commonly used to investigate selection among different alternatives in a changing environment is the task-switching paradigm. Functional neuroimaging has pointed out a role for the posterior medial frontal cortex and the posterior parietal cortex in the voluntary selection of task sets. In the present study, we set out to investigate the temporal dynamics of these agency-related processes (in task choice vs. no-choice conditions) using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). The results revealed agency-related modulations of a series of ERP components, including (1) an early parieto-occipital activation, taken to reflect the evaluation of choice versus no choice; (2) a subsequent medial frontal expression of the voluntary selection between task sets; (3) a CNV-like sustained negativity in preparation for the target; (4) a target-induced N210—P210 complex, taken to reflect early sensory-perceptual processing; and (5) a target-induced P3, associated with the evaluation of the stimulus and its designated response vis-à-vis the chosen versus competing task sets. Together, these results indicate that the opportunity to choose between tasks invokes activity originating from the medial frontal cortex, associated with voluntary task set selection, but also activation at different time points in a number of other brain areas, not necessarily captured by functional neuroimaging.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barceló, F., Muñoz-Céspedes, J. M., Pozo, M. A. & Rubia, F. J. (2000). Attentional set shifting modulates the target P3b response in the Wisconsin card sorting test. Neuropsychologica, 38, 1342–1355.
Barceló, F., Periáñez, J. A. & Knight, R. T. (2002). Think differently: A brain orienting response to task novelty. NeuroReport, 13, 1887–1892.
Bledowski, C., Cohen Kadosh, K., Wibral, M., Rahm, B., Bittner, R. A., Hoechstetter, K., et al. (2006). Mental chronometry of working memory retrieval: A combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related potentials approach. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 821–829.
Bledowski, C., Prvulovic, D., Hoechstetter, K., Scherg, M., Wibral, M., Goebel, R. & Linden, D. E. (2004). Localizing P300 generators in visual target and distractor processing: A combined event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 9353–9360.
Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissel, K., Carter, C. S. & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402, 179–181.
Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., Forstmann, B., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 314–316.
Brass, M., Ullsperger, M., Knoesche, T. R., von Cramon, D. Y., & Phillips, N. A. (2005). Who comes first? The role of the prefrontal and parietal cortex in cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1367–1375.
Brass, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 908–914.
Brass, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Decomposing components of task preparation with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 609–620.
Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R. & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747–749.
Coles, M. G. H., Scheffers, M. K. & Holroyd, C. B. (2001). Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing. Biological Psychology, 56, 173–189.
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000). Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 292–297.
Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.
Derrfuss, J., Brass, M., Neumann, J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: Metaanalyses of switching and Stroop studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 22–34.
Duncan, J. & Owen, A. M. (2000). Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 475–483.
Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S. & Hohnsbein, J. (2000). ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: A tutorial. Biological Psychology, 51, 87–107.
Fink, G. R., Dolan, R. J., Halligan, P. W., Marshall, J. C. & Frith, C. D. (1997). Space-based and object-based visual attention: Shared and specific neural domains. Brain, 120, 2013–2028.
Forstmann, B. U., Brass, M., Koch, I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Internally generated and directly cued task sets: An investigation with fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 43, 943–952.
Forstmann, B. U., Brass, M., Koch, I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Voluntary selection of task sets revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 388–398.
Foucher, J. R., Otzenberger, H. & Gounot, D. (2003). The BOLD response and the gamma oscillations respond differently than evoked potentials: An interleaved EEG—fMRI study. BMC Neuroscience, 4, 22.
Huettel, S. A., McKeown, M. J., Song, A. W., Hart, S., Spencer, D. D., Allison, T. & McCarthy, G. (2004). Linking hemodynamic and electrophysiological measures of brain activity: Evidence from functional MRI and intracranial field potentials. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 165–173.
Ille, N., Berg, P. & Scherg, M. (2002). Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 19, 113–124.
Joyce, C. & Rossion, B. (2005). The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2613–2631.
Karayanidis, F., Coltheart, M., Michie, P. T. & Murphy, K. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory and poststimulus components of task switching. Psychophysiology, 40, 329–348.
Kastner, S., Pinsk, M. A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1999). Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron, 22, 751–761.
Kieffaber, P. D. & Hetrick, W. P. (2005). Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs. Psychophysiology, 42, 56–71.
Koch, I. (2003). The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 488–492.
Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38, 557–577.
Lau, H. C., Rogers, R. D., Ramnani, N. & Passingham, R. E. (2004). Willed action and attention to the selection of action. NeuroImage, 21, 1407–1415.
Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.
Miller, E. K. & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.
Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G. & Cohen, J. D. (2005). Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus—norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 510–532.
Nobre, A. C., Sebestyen, G. N., Gitelman, D. R., Mesulam, M. M., Frackowiak, R. S. & Frith, C. D. (1997). Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. Brain, 120, 515–533.
Picard, N. & Strick, P. L. (1996). Motor areas of the medial wall: A review of their location and functional activation. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 342–353.
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A. & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443–447.
Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P., Segalowitz, S. J., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain & Cognition, 56, 129–140.
Rogers, R. D. & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.
Ruge, H., Brass, M., Koch, I., Rubin, O., Meiran, N., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Advance preparation and stimulus-induced interference in cued task switching: Further insights from BOLD fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 43, 340–355.
Rushworth, M. F. S., Behrens, T. E. J., Rudebeck, P. H. & Walton, M. E. (2007). Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 168–176.
Rushworth, M. F. S., Hadland, K. A., Paus, T. & Sipila, P. K. (2002). Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: A combined fMRI and TMS study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 2577–2592.
Rushworth, M. F. S., Passingham, R. E. & Nobre, A. C. (2002). Components of switching intentional set. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1139–1150.
Rushworth, M. F. S., Passingham, R. E. & Nobre, A. C. (2005). Components of attentional set-switching. Experimental Psychology, 52, 83–98.
Rushworth, M. F. S., Walton, M. E., Kennerly, S. W. & Bannerman, D. M. (2004). Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 410–417.
Schendan, H. E. & Kutas, M. (2007). Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 734–749.
Tieges, Z., Snel, J., Kok, A., Wijnen, J. G., Lorist, M. M., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2006). Caffeine improves anticipatory processes in task switching. Biological Psychology, 73, 101–113.
Tomita, H., Ohbayashi, M., Nakahara, K., Hasegawa, I., & Miyashita, Y. (1999). Top-down signal from prefrontal cortex in executive control of memory retrieval. Nature, 401, 699–703.
Ullsperger, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Subprocesses of performance monitoring: A dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs. NeuroImage, 14, 1387–1401.
van Boxtel, G. J. M. & Brunia, C. H. M. (1994). Motor and nonmotor components of the contingent negative variation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 17, 269–279.
Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131–156.
Walter, W., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V., McCallum, W. & Winter, A. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380–384.
Walton, M. E., Devlin, J. T. & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2004). Interactions between decision making and performance monitoring within prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1259–1265.
Wylie, G. R., Javitt, D. C. & Foxe, J. J. (2003). Task switching: A high-density electrical mapping study. NeuroImage, 20, 2322–2342.
Wylie, G. R., Javitt, D. C. & Foxe, J. J. (2004). Don’t think of a white bear: An fMRI investigation of the effects of sequential instructional sets on cortical activity in a task-switching paradigm. Human Brain Mapping, 21, 279–297.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work of B.U.F. and K.R.R. was supported by a VICI grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) to K.R.R.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forstmann, B.U., Ridderinkhof, K.R., Kaiser, J. et al. At your own peril: An ERP study of voluntary task set selection processes in the medial frontal cortex. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 7, 286–296 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.4.286
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.4.286