Abstract
A change detection task was used to estimate the visual short-term memory storage capacity for either the orientation or the size of objects. On each trial, several objects were briefly presented, followed by a blank interval and then by a second display of objects that either was identical to the first display or had a single object that was different (the object changed either orientation or size, in separate experiments). The task was to indicate whether the two displays were the same or different, and the number of objects remembered was estimated from the percent correct on this task. Storage capacity for a feature was nearly twice as large when that feature was defined by the object boundary, rather than by the surface texture of the object. This dramatic difference in storage capacity suggests that a particular feature (e.g., right tilted or small) is not stored in memory with an invariant abstract code. Instead, there appear to be different codes for the boundary and surface features of objects, and memory operates on boundary features more efficiently than it operates on surface features.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by total information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106–111.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.
Cohen, M. A., & Grossberg, S. (1984). Neural dynamics of brightness perception: Features, boundaries, diffusion, and resonance. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 428–456.
Comtois, R. (2003). VisionShell PPC [Software libraries]. Cambridge, MA: Author.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
Dresp, B., & Grossberg, S. (1999). Spatial facilitation by color and luminance edges: Boundary, surface, and attentional factors. Vision Research, 39, 3431–3443.
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Grier, J. B. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 424–429.
Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. (1985a). Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. Psychological Review, 92, 173–211.
Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. (1985b). Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 141–171.
Hollingworth, A. (2003). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 388–403.
Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Olson, I. R. (2004). Perceptual grouping in change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 446–453.
Jiang, Y., Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 683–702.
Joseph, J. S., Chun, M. M., & Nakayama, K. (1997). Attentional requirements in a “preattentive” feature search task. Nature, 387, 805–808.
Kaernbach, C. (1991). Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 227–229.
Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research, 43, 149–164.
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.
Magnussen, S., Greenlee, M. W., Asplund, R., & Dyrnes, S. (1990). Perfect short-term memory for periodic patterns. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 245–262.
Magnussen, S., Idas, E., & Myhre, S. H. (1998). Representation of orientation and spatial frequency in perception and memory: A choice reaction-time analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 707–718.
Magnussen, S., & Stein, D. (1994). High-fidelity perceptual long-term memory. Psychological Science, 5, 99–102.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Mitroff, S. R., Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (2004). Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1268–1281.
Mokhtarian, F., Abbasi, S., & Kittler, J. (1996). Robust and efficient shape indexing through curvature scale space. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 1996 (pp. 53–62). Malvern, U.K.: British Machine Vision Association.
Needham, A. (1999). The role of shape in 4-month-old infants’ object segregation. Infant Behavior & Development, 22, 161–178.
Palmer, J. (1990). Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 332–350.
Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283–290.
Shim, W. M., Alvarez, G. A., & Jiang, Y. (2005, May). Capacity limit of visual working memory in parietal cortex reflects capacity limit of spatial selection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
Simon, H. A. (1974). How big is a chunk? Science, 183, 482–488.
Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15–48.
Tremoulet, P. D., Leslie, A. M., & Hall, G. D. (2000). Infant individuation and identification of objects. Cognitive Development, 15, 499–522.
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 92–114.
Walker, P., & Hinkley, L. (2003). Visual memory for shape-color conjunctions utilizes structural descriptions of letter shape. Visual Cognition, 10, 987–1000.
Wang, L., Khan, L., & Breen, C. (2002). Object boundary detection for ontology-based image classification. In J. S. Simeon, C. Djeraba, & O. R. Zaïane (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining in conjunction with Eighth ACM SIGKDD (pp. 51–61). Edmonton, AB: ACM.
Wilken, P., & Ma, W. J. (2004). A detection theory account of change detection. Journal of Vision, 4, 1120–1135.
Wolfe, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Stewart, M. I., & O’Connell, K. M. (1992). The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 34–49.
Wright, M., Green, A., & Baker, S. (2000). Limitations for change detection in multiple Gabor targets. Visual Cognition, 7, 237–252.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
G.A.A. was supported by NIH/NIMH Predoctoral Fellowship MH069095 and NIH/NEI Postdoctoral Fellowship EY016982. P.C. was supported by NIH Grant EY09258.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alvarez, G.A., Cavanagh, P. Visual short-term memory operates more efficiently on boundary features than on surface features. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 346–364 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.2.346
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.2.346