The foods we eat can affect our lifespan, but it is also possible that thinking about food may have effects on our health. Choosing what to eat is one of the main ways we think about food, and most animals, including the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, choose their foods. The effects of these choices can affect health via a chemical in the brain called serotonin. This chemical interacts with proteins called serotonin 2A receptors in the brain, which then likely primes the body to process nutrients.

To understand how serotonin affected the lifespan and health of fruit flies, Lyu et al. compared flies that were offered a single food to those that could choose between several foods. The flies that had a choice of foods lived shorter lives and produced more serotonin, but these effects were reversed when Lyu et al. limited the amount of a protein called glutamate dehydrogenase, which helps cells process nutrients.

These results suggest that choosing what we eat can impact lifespan, ageing and health. Human and fly brains share many similarities, but human brain chemistry is more complex, as is our experience of food. This work demonstrates that food choices can affect lifespan. More research into this phenomenon may shed further light onto how our thoughts and decision-making impact our health.

For nearly all metazoans, many aspects of biology are continuously influenced by information about nutrient availability. Interest in the nutritional determinants of aging date back to the early 1900s, as experiments in fruit flies (Chippindale et al., 1993; Chapman and Partridge, 1996) and rodents (McCay et al., 1935; Weindruch et al., 1986; Weindruch and Walford, 1982) revealed that limiting total food intake or reducing diet quality, without malnutrition, increased lifespan. Dietary restriction (DR, also called caloric restriction) is now known to effectively increase the lifespan of nearly every species to which it has been applied. In mammals, increased lifespan in response to DR is accompanied by a broad-spectrum improvement in health during aging (Weindruch and Walford, 1988; Longo and Finch, 2003; Barger et al., 2008; Contestabile, 2009).

Research over the past century on the effects of DR has revealed how food characteristics influence healthy aging (Fontana and Partridge, 2015; Tatar et al., 2014). For many years, it was believed that the caloric content of the food and the amount of energy consumed by the animal were the driving forces behind the effects of restriction on lifespan (Masoro, 2005). More recently, however, conceptual advances such as the geometric framework for nutrition (Lee et al., 2008; Solon-Biet et al., 2014; Skorupa et al., 2008), together with comprehensive experiments that manipulate diet in model systems (Skorupa et al., 2008; Bruce et al., 2013; Solon-Biet et al., 2014; Jensen et al., 2015), have made it clear that dietary composition and availability of specific nutrients are often more relevant than calories in shaping life histories. For example, in homogenous nutritional environments where all nutrients are mixed together in a single food, animals fed a high carbohydrate–low protein diet generally live longer than siblings fed a calorically equivalent low carbohydrate–high protein diet (Lee et al., 2008; Bruce et al., 2013). Short-term experiments in heterogeneous nutritional environments, where animals are given a choice of two foods with different macronutrient ratios, reveal a behavioral preference for a diet that is high in carbohydrate and low in protein, suggesting that animals will adjust their dietary choices to optimize evolutionary fitness (Lee et al., 2008; Jensen et al., 2015; Bunning et al., 2016). The long-term effects of a complex nutritional environment and the accompanying dietary choices on physiology and healthy aging are unknown. Macronutrient intake will almost surely not be the only factor here because sensory perception of specific nutrients (Ostojic et al., 2014; Waterson et al., 2014), and even the presence of choice itself (Avondo et al., 2013; Steenfeldt et al., 2019), may be influential.

We have recently reported that how a meal is presented, or perhaps the way in which it is eaten, modulates aging in Drosophila (Ro et al., 2016). We found that flies were longer-lived when aged in an environment in which all dietary components were mixed together (termed a fixed diet) compared to one in which the two macronutrients, yeast and sugar, were available separately (termed a choice diet). When presented with a choice diet, flies consume an equivalent amount of protein and a higher carbohydrate:protein ratio than they do when fed a nutritionally equivalent fixed diet. Contrary to the results of most geometric nutritional studies (Bruce et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2008), however, their lifespan is shorter than those fed on high carbohydrate:protein fixed diets. This led us to speculate that the effects of dietary choice were derived, at least in part, from unknown effects of the complex nutritional environment.

Here we present a series of experimental results that indicate that dietary choice elicits significant changes in the physiology and lifespan of male Drosophila melanogaster through mechanisms that are distinct, at least in part, from nutrient consumption. Coincident changes in behavioral and health metrics suggest that flies exhibit distinct neural and metabolic states when presented with a choice diet than they do when presented with one that is nutritionally homogeneous. We report that neuronal expression of serotonin receptor 2A (5-HT2A) during the adult stage is required for many of the effects caused by dietary choice, including a 5-HT2A-dependent metabolic reprogramming that is consistent with a significant upregulation of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and amino acid metabolism when nutrients were presented separately. Transgenic knockdown of a key enzyme, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), which is predicted to diminish the metabolic changes induced by a choice diet, abrogated its effects on lifespan. Future research may elucidate the downstream targets through which neuronal 5-HT2A signals acts as a potent modulator of aging and physiology in an environment much like our own, where animals must constantly choose between different nutrients.

As with most model organisms, D. melanogaster reared in a conventional laboratory setting is normally provided with a homogenous, complete media that meets all of its nutritional needs. For flies, this medium is comprised predominantly of a source of protein and micronutrients (e.g., brewer’s yeast) and a carbohydrate source (e.g., sucrose). In natural conditions, however, a complete food source is unlikely to be found, and animals must seek out and identify nutritionally complementary foods (Csata et al., 2020; Mayntz et al., 2005). Indeed, fruit flies are known to recognize and choose among different macronutrients based on palatability (Weiss et al., 2011; Harris et al., 2015) and physiological demand (Ribeiro and Dickson, 2010; Vargas et al., 2010; Ro et al., 2016; Steck et al., 2018). While studying the mechanisms underlying protein feeding, we observed significant modulation of survival depending on whether the animals were given a complete diet or were provided with a dietary choice by presenting the two macronutrient sources separately (Figure 1A, also see Ro et al., 2016). These effects were observed in both sexes (Figure 1A) and in different laboratory strains (Supplementary file 1). The magnitude of the choice effect was consistently greater in males (29–37% change in mean lifespan) than in females (5–15% change in mean lifespan, see Supplementary file 1). Similar effects were observed using two D. melanogaster lines that were recently collected from the wild: the lifespans of male strains were consistently and significantly reduced in response to dietary choice and there was variability in the female response (Figure 1B). The effects on lifespan are not due to some sort of acute toxicity because flies maintained on a choice diet for a short period (e.g., 2 weeks) exhibited general health metrics, such as intestinal integrity and climbing ability (Figure 1C,D), that were indistinguishable from siblings that were fed a fixed diet. Together these results indicate that the effects of dietary choice on lifespan are sex specific and are not an artifact of long-term laboratory culture.

Four lines of evidence indicate that the effect of a choice diet on lifespan is driven, at least in part, by mechanisms that are independent of increased sucrose consumption. First, increased sugar consumption alone is generally not associated with a large reduction in fly lifespan; even extremely sugar-rich diets (e.g., greater than 8× sugar intake) have only modest effects (Dobson et al., 2017), much smaller than we observed following dietary choice. New data that we obtained when we measured lifespan on fixed diets designed to approximate the nutritional composition that flies voluntarily constructed from their choice diet were consistent with this interpretation. We compared the lifespans of flies aged on a choice diet with those obtained from flies aged on one of two high-sugar, fixed diets (S30Y3 and S24Y3; i.e., 30% [w/v] sugar or 24% [w/v] sucrose mixed with 3% [w/v] yeast, respectively), among which flies consumed statistically indistinguishable amounts of both sugar and yeast (Figure 1F, represented as mass of nutrient consumed). The effect of dietary choice, relative to the standard SY10 diet, was much greater than that from homogeneous high-sugar diets (Figure 1G). Second, the effects of the choice diet on gross measures of fly physiology were distinctly different from those caused by increased sugar intake in the fixed diet. Flies exposed to a choice diet exhibited a significant reduction in triglyceride/protein ratio (Figure 1H) and triglyceride abundance (Figure 1—figure supplement 1; total weight was not affected; ), while increased sugar in the fixed diets had no such effect (Figure 1H, Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Third, we observed that simply changing the nature of the choice, by manipulating the concentration of the yeast component of the choice diet, was sufficient to modulate lifespan even though both cohorts of flies consumed the same amount of sugar and protein (Figure 1I,J, represented as mass of nutrient consumed). Moreover, the effect was opposite to that normally seen when similar manipulations were applied to a homogeneous diet (Mair et al., 2005); an increased concentration of the yeast component of choice extended lifespan (Figure 1I). Fourth, the transcription factor dFoxo is required both for transcriptional changes and for nutritional programming of lifespan caused by excess dietary sugar (Dobson et al., 2017), but it is dispensable for the lifespan effect of dietary choice (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Together, these observations suggest that animals respond differently to macronutrients depending on how they are presented and that the effects of dietary choice on lifespan and physiology may be mediated by processes that are distinct from macronutrient intake.

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 1—source data 1

Effects of dietary choice on lifespan and behavior.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/59399/elife-59399-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx

Download elife-59399-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx

Although protein intake was not different in flies fed different diets, it seemed possible that dietary choice improved protein absorption, which might be important considering the influential role of this macronutrient in reducing lifespan (Fontana and Partridge, 2015). Evidence suggests that this is not the case. Individual weight was not different among flies fed different diets (Figure 1—figure supplement 1), and total protein was lower in flies given a dietary choice than it was in their siblings fed a fixed diet, which is the opposite of what would be expected from the effect of dietary choice on lifespan. Furthermore, molecular and physiological markers that were strongly affected by protein availability, including target of rapamycin (TOR) activity (Fontana and Partridge, 2015) and female fecundity (Jensen et al., 2015), were not altered by dietary choice (Figure 1—figure supplement 3).

Previously, we hypothesized that neuronal mechanisms involved in nutrient evaluation might influence lifespan when macronutrients are presented separately (Ro et al., 2016). Our candidate screen of neurotransmitters and their receptors revealed that the presence of a P-element insertion in the promoter region of serotonin receptor 2A (5-HT2A^PL00052), which creates a putative loss of function mutation in this gene (Nichols, 2007), reduced protein preference in starved female flies and significantly extended lifespan under dietary choice (Ro et al., 2016). Loss of function in other serotonin receptors had no influence on protein preference (Ro et al., 2016), yet it remains to be tested whether they influence the aging processes in a choice environment. Here we focused on elucidating the mechanisms underlying the effects of the 5-HT2A receptor and expanded our analysis of its effects on dietary choice and male lifespan.

Indeed, we found that the P-element insertion in 5-HT2A fully abrogated the male lifespan differences between fixed and choice dietary environments, largely by increasing lifespan when nutrients were presented individually (see Figure 2A). Mutant flies were modestly short-lived on the standard, fixed diet, which is likely due to the pleotropic effects of this receptor (Gasque et al., 2013; Chakraborty et al., 2019; Howard et al., 2019). We also investigated the influence of RNAi-based knockdown of 5-HT2A expression using multiple RNAi lines. Because 5-HT2A is highly expressed in the central nervous system (Supplementary file 2), we used the pan-neuronal driver elav-GAL4 to achieve 5-HT2A knockdown, and we observed that this manipulation abrogated the lifespan effect of dietary choice using one of the RNAi lines (UAS-5-HT2A-RNAi^TRiP) and strongly reduced the effect in the second (UAS-5-HT2A-RNAi^KK; Figure 2B). We also observed that the survivorship of adult flies fed with 200 µM pirenperone, an anxiolytic known to antagonize 5-HT2A receptor signaling in mammals, was unaffected by nutrient presentation, further supporting a role for this receptor and ruling out a necessity for loss of function during development (Figure 2C, Figure 2—figure supplement 1 for the second replicate). Together, these results implicate neuronal expression of receptor 5-HT2A in the adult male fly in mediating the effect of dietary choice on lifespan.

Although we concluded that nutrient intake was unlikely to be responsible for the difference in lifespan in wild-type flies, it remained formally possible that feeding differences between control and 5-HT2A mutant flies were responsible for the dissimilar response to dietary choice. Our previous work demonstrated that 5-HT2A influenced protein preference after starvation (Ro et al., 2016), and we asked whether it influenced nutrient consumption in fed flies. Surprisingly, we found that, in the choice environment, 5-HT2A mutant flies exhibited feeding characteristics similar to control animals: each consumed significantly more sucrose than yeast when given a dietary choice (Figure 2D), despite spending the majority of their time physically located on the yeast food (Figure 2E). Unlike control animals, however, the behavioral differences in 5-HT2A mutants were not coupled to changes in lifespan.

DR, and the extended lifespan that accompanies it, are associated with increased locomotion behavior in several species (Weindruch et al., 1986; Weed et al., 1997; Chen, 2005), presumably reflecting a motivational state of hunger. By video tracking control and mutant flies in each of the dietary environments (using our DTrack system, see Materials and methods), we found that control flies were generally more active when given a dietary choice: they traveled significantly farther in a 6 hr window when compared to siblings housed on a fixed diet. 5-HT2A mutant flies responded similarly (Figure 2F, two-way ANOVA on the square root transformed values, p_{Diet*Genotype}>0.05). Behavioral classification of the movements during this time (Corrales-Carvajal et al., 2016) revealed that diet-dependent differences were mirrored in both the time spent walking (speed > 2 mm/s), in executing micromovements (e.g., grooming or when 0.2 mm/s < movement speed ≤ 2 mm/s), and in the time spent sleeping or resting (speed ≤ 0.2 mm/s) (Figure 2G). As with total distance moved, 5-HT2A mutants exhibited similar responses as control animals in all of these measures (Figure 2G, two-way ANOVA on the square root transformed values, p_{Diet * Genotype}>0.05). From these data we concluded that diet-dependent changes in locomotion are not causal to changes in lifespan.

Increased locomotor behavior has been linked with stress in mice (Sestakova et al., 2013) and perhaps in flies (Mohammad et al., 2016), leading us to examine whether other stress-related phenotypes were changed in flies fed a choice diet (Strekalova et al., 2005; Linford et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2015). First, we measured alcohol consumption because ethanol intake is known to be potentiated by conditions of stress or reward depletion (Devineni and Heberlein, 2009; Shohat-Ophir et al., 2012). We found that when flies were provided a dietary choice for 10 days prior to being exposed to sucrose food containing 15% (v/v) ethanol, they interacted with the ethanol food significantly more than did flies previously fed a homogenous fixed diet (Figure 2H, see Materials and methods for more details). 5-HT2A mutant flies did not exhibit a difference in ethanol food interactions based on previous diet (Figure 2H). Second, we measured triglyceride (TAG) abundance (Figures 1H and 2J), which has been postulated to be a physiological indicator of stress (Starzec et al., 1981; Starzec and Berger, 1986). We found that flies given a dietary choice had reduced TAG and lived shorter following starvation on 2% agar than did flies fed a homogenous food (Figure 2I). Both phenotypes were 5-HT2A dependent (Figure 2I ,J).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 2—source data 1

Requirement of 5-HT2A in the dietary choice effects.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/59399/elife-59399-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx

Download elife-59399-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx

Our results indicated that 5-HT2A is not involved in determining how animals interact with the choice environment, yet the requirement of this neuronal signaling in lifespan (Figure 2B) and physiological traits (Figure 2I,J) suggested that it may play a role in mediating internal nutrient homeostasis when flies are presented with a dietary choice. We therefore sought to identify changes in metabolite abundance using targeted metabolomics. To delineate an appropriate window of time to study, we completed a demographic analysis of the effect of dietary choice on age-specific mortality. Mortality rates of male flies whose nutrients were presented separately following eclosion exhibited measurable and high mortality rates by day 10, while similar levels of mortality in flies exposed to a homogenous food did not appear until day 40 (Figure 3A, compare black and orange solid lines). To determine how quickly the effects of nutrient presentation manifest, we performed a switch experiment in which flies fed a homogenous medium since eclosion were given a dietary choice beginning on day 20. We observed that the mortality rate of the switched cohort rose within 48 hr after choice began, and after roughly 5 days, it reached the level of the cohort whose nutrients had been separate since eclosion. We also performed the opposite experiment in which nutrients were combined into a fixed diet at day 20. Flies in this cohort exhibited a rapid decrease in mortality, again within 48 hr. Mortality rates in this cohort reached the level observed for flies that had been fed a homogenous food since eclosion, but this process took roughly 10 days (Figure 3B), which was longer than the reverse (Figure 3A). Cohorts that comprised 5-HT2A mutant animals exhibited similar patterns of mortality regardless of nutrient presentation, and these patterns were also unaffected by dietary switch (Figure 3C,D).

Figure 3 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 3—source data 1

Mortality data.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/59399/elife-59399-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx

Download elife-59399-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx

We reasoned that metabolic changes that are causally related to aging would be identified by focusing on those that were abrogated by loss of 5-HT2A. Others, perhaps those triggered by differences in feeding behaviors or food intake (and independence of the lifespan effect), would persist in the two strains. We also chose to sample flies 48 hr after a dietary switch because this period was sufficient to significantly affect mortality rates (see Figure 3A and B) and because we felt that a comparison of switched to unswitched cohorts at this time would help further isolate changes that were causal to lifespan (Figure 3E). Finally, although neural expression of 5-HT2A was required for the lifespan effects of dietary choice (Figure 2B above), it is also putatively expressed in salivary glands, in digestive tissues such as the crop, and in reproductive organs (Supplementary file 2). We therefore collected heads and bodies separately to determine whether the metabolomic effects of the two nutritional environments were enriched in the brain or whether they also manifested in peripheral tissues.

Using principal component analysis (PCA), we identified three principal components (PCs) in each of the tissue samples by which metabolome profiles effectively separated genotypic effects from those caused by nutrient presentation (additional PCA are presented in Figure 3—figure supplement 1 and Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Genotype effects on the metabolome were demonstrated by PC2 and PC3 in the head and body data, respectively (Figure 3F,G). A second PC in each data set identified diet history (PC3 and PC2 in heads and bodies, respectively; Figure 3F,G). These combinations of metabolites provided separation based on how nutrients were presented to the flies for the 20 days prior to the dietary switch, and they were largely unaffected by the switch itself. Separation was also observed in 5-HT2A mutant flies, suggesting that the metabolites that load strongly on these axes exhibit slow, persistent changes in response to differences in nutrient presentation that are not associated with changes in mortality. Finally, a single PC in both heads and bodies (represented by PC6 in both data sets) distinguished acute responses to dietary switch in both tissues that were abrogated in 5-HT2A mutant animals (Figure 3H,I). These PCs identified specific metabolites in either heads or bodies that were correlated with changes in mortality and that shared a common 5-HT2A dependence.

The PCA results suggested that nutrient presentation influenced two processes: (A) a relatively stable 5-HT2A-independent metabolic network that responded slowly to dietary environment and that accounted for a significant amount of metabolome variation (10.2–11.2%) and (B) a dynamic 5-HT2A-dependent metabolic network that accounted for a smaller component of variation (2.0–2.2%) that responded quickly to dietary choice and that was associated with mortality. Using generalized linear models, we identified individual metabolites that exhibited statistically significant changes consistent with membership in each of these two groups (a summary of the analysis of a third group that distinguished genotype effects is presented in Figure 3—figure supplement 3; statistics for each metabolite are presented in Supplementary file 3). Criteria for inclusion in Group A consisted of a statistically significant effect of diet (p_Diet<0.05) and a non-significant diet × genotype interaction (p_{Diet*Genotype}>0.05). Of the 103 and 125 metabolites that were detected in each tissue sample, respectively, we found that 45 (heads) and 46 (bodies) satisfied these criteria (Figure 4A). Among those metabolites, 13 (heads) and 21 (bodies) exhibited an increase in abundance when nutrients were presented independently, while abundances of the remaining metabolites were reduced. Although our sample of measured metabolites was small and precluded a comprehensive pathway analysis (see Materials and methods), MetaboAnalystR (Pang et al., 2020) applied to the full list of significant metabolites revealed several candidate pathways (i.e., those with more than three significantly affected metabolites in each), nearly all involved in amino acid metabolism, which may be specifically affected by dietary choice (Figure 4C, see Materials and methods). Over 40% of the metabolites (N = 19 of 45 or 46 metabolites in the head or body, respectively) were modulated in both samples (starred in Figure 4A). While 75% of these (N = 14) were modulated in the same direction, there remained nearly a quarter of them that exhibited opposite changes in abundance.

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Changes in Group B, which represented the 5-HT2A-dependent metabolome, were fewer in number but more consistent across tissue samples. We identified 18 of 103 total metabolites in the head and 19 of 125 total metabolites in the body that were present in this group (Figure 4B, ANOVA, p_{Diet*Genotype}≤0.05). In this case, six of seven of the metabolites that were present in both groups (starred in Figure 4B) were modulated in the same direction. Furthermore, MetaboAnalystR identified related pathways, involving the synthesis of aminoacyl-tRNAs or specific amino acids, which were found either in both tissues or only in the body (Figure 4D). Among them, ‘alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism’ was the only category of interest in both tissues, specifically in a 5-HT2A-dependent manner. A closer look into its metabolic map (KEGG ID: map00250) revealed that candidate metabolites are either members of the TCA cycle or the direct precursors of TCA metabolites, which indicated the modulation of this metabolic process in response to dietary choice.

A detailed examination of 5-HT2A-dependent metabolites, and the relationships among them, indicated significant upregulation of the TCA cycle and amino acid metabolism when nutrients were presented separately (Figure 5A). The TCA cycle is a series of biochemical reactions that generates energy (ATP) through the oxidation of acetyl-CoA derived from different nutrients, while the same reactions also provide precursors for amino acids (Figure 5B). Specifically, we found that oxaloacetate abundance was increased in both tissue samples in a 5-HT2A-dependent manner, while α-ketoglutarate and fumarate were upregulated only in heads and bodies, respectively. Further analysis revealed consistency among the abundances of the amino acid precursors of these intermediates, which were also increased in their corresponding tissues (Figure 5A,B). Asparagine, the immediate precursor for oxaloacetate, was increased in both heads and bodies; glutamine, the major precursor for α-ketoglutarate, was increased only in heads; and aspartate, the precursor of fumarate, was increased only in bodies. Although we were unable to measure abundance of acetyl-CoA directly, we observed that the abundance of lysine, its precursor, was increased in both tissue samples.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 5—source data 1

Lifespan and feeding data from GDH knock-down.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/59399/elife-59399-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx

Download elife-59399-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx

Inspired by concurrent changes in TCA intermediates and their precursors, we investigated the direct roles of biochemical reactions that produce the TCA metabolites in the modulation of aging in response to dietary choice. We targeted the enzyme GDH, which converts glutamate to α-ketoglutarate, for RNAi-mediated knockdown. Our metabolomic data revealed significantly increased abundance of α-ketoglutarate in the heads of animals given a dietary choice, and α-ketoglutarate has been shown to modulate longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans (Chin et al., 2014). Knocking-down GDH abundance in adult flies using the RU486-dependent GeneSwitch system (Roman et al., 2001) (tub-GS-GAL4) coupled with UAS-GDH-RNAi blocked the lifespan differences between two dietary environments (Figure 5C). This was not caused by the transcriptional inducer, RU486, because control animals (tub-GS-GAL4 coupled with UAS-GFP) responded as expected to dietary choice when RU486 was presented (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). GDH knockdown had no effect on nutrient consumption (Figure 5D) or total protein abundance in the fly (Figure 5—figure supplement 2). Which tissues/cells are critical for the diet-specific lifespan effects induced by GDH knockdown, and whether such influences are due to changes in α-ketoglutarate per se or to alterations in the metabolic network more broadly (Hoffman et al., 2017) remain to be determined.

Here we studied the effects of meal presentation on aging and physiology in Drosophila. By separating the two macronutrients of the standard Drosophila laboratory diet (i.e., brewer’s yeast and sucrose) and allowing the animals to behaviorally structure their own diet, we found that lifespan was significantly shortened in both male and female flies. In addition, changes in activity, stress resistance, lipid metabolism, and critical metabolic processes were also elicited by dietary choice. Flies carrying a loss-of-function mutation in serotonin receptor 5A (5-HT2A), with RNAi-mediated neuronal knockdown of 5-HT2A expression, or fed the putative receptor antagonist pirenperone, exhibited no differences in lifespan between choice and fixed diets, indicating that serotonin signaling through this receptor plays an essential role in the effect of nutrient presentation on aging.

Flies voluntarily consumed more sugar than yeast when presented with a choice diet. Although it is difficult to definitively rule out differences in consumption as a cause for the phenotypes we observe, several lines of evidence indicate that is not the major factor influencing lifespan: (1) the effect of dietary choice on lifespan is significantly larger than that caused by even the most extreme carbohydrate-rich fixed diets (as shown in both Figure 1G and previous studies from Skorupa et al., 2008; Dobson et al., 2017); (2) the choice diet induced physiological effects (e.g., reduced triglyceride abundance) opposite of those associated with a high-sugar fixed diet (e.g., increased or unchanged triglyceride abundance depending on the genetic background, see Skorupa et al., 2008); (3) the insulin-responsive transcription factor, dFoxo, which is an essential effector of dietary sugar on aging (Dobson et al., 2017), is not required for the effect of dietary choice on lifespan; (4) manipulating the nature of the choice is sufficient to influence lifespan without altering the amount of nutrients eaten in a choice paradigm; and (5) flies with loss of 5-HT2A exhibited the same diet-dependent changes in feeding as did control animals, yet they experienced no diet-induced changes in lifespan (Figure 2A,D).

We found that dietary choice influenced lifespan in both male and female laboratory flies and that 5-HT2A is required for this effect in both sexes (see female data in Ro et al., 2016), suggesting the mechanisms are at least partially shared between them. However, sex-specific phenomena were also observed: lifespan was significantly shortened in male flies for all strains tested (from 11 to 37% in laboratory and wild strains), whereas the effects on lifespan were variable in recently wild-caught females (an average of 3% reduction) relative to a fixed diet. This is, perhaps, not surprising given the effects of different macronutrients among different strains (Jin et al., 2020) and sexes (Hudry et al., 2019; Camus et al., 2019; Jensen et al., 2015). Future studies that focus on dissecting the role of individual macronutrients on choice effects or on investigating the involvement of sex-specific nutrient sensing proteins (see Hudry et al., 2019), perhaps with a focus on population genetics of natural populations, will be useful for understanding the nature of sexual dimorphism on lifespan and physiology.

We found that dietary choice led to a rapid and reversible change in age-specific mortality only during a defined period of life. Dietary choice significantly increased mortality within 48 hr of exposure, and this effect was observed only up until middle age (roughly 40 days in our experiments) after which time mortality rates in cohorts provided a fixed or choice diet were indistinguishable. This was true regardless of whether the flies had been presented with a dietary choice starting at eclosion or starting at 20 days of age, and these effects required serotonin receptor 5-HT2A. The effects of dietary choice on demographic aging, therefore, do not appear to accumulate, and they are simply absent in older flies, perhaps because of an age-dependent reduction in serotonin signaling, a lack of consequences of such signaling in older animals, or the manifestation of demographic heterogeneity (Vaupel and Yashin, 1985). These mortality patterns are distinct from those observed following other types of dietary or environmental perturbations. DR in flies is typically carried out by diluting both the yeast and carbohydrate components of a complete, fixed diet (Chapman and Partridge, 1996). DR rapidly influences mortality dynamics, and it is reversible at early ages. Unlike dietary choice, however, DR influences demographic aging across the whole of adulthood (Mair et al., 2003). The effect of different temperatures on mortality is cumulative and permanent (Mair et al., 2003; Carvalho et al., 2017).

The neuronal response to dietary choice reshapes metabolic networks that are associated with energy homeostasis in peripheral tissues (see our model in Figure 6). Some of these changes are mediated by 5-HT2A, which is widely expressed in the central nervous system (Gnerer et al., 2015) and in the thoracicoabdominal ganglion (Supplementary file 2). Our metabolomic data revealed that TCA cycle components, as well as key components of amino acid metabolism, are strongly affected by food choice and that such changes require 5-HT2A. There is evidence that at least one such metabolite, α-ketoglutarate (αKG), is directly involved in the effect of dietary choice on lifespan. αKG was more abundant when flies were presented with a choice diet, and inhibition of GDH, which is involved in αKG synthesis, abrogated the difference in lifespan between choice and fixed diets (see also Talbert et al., 2015). In C. elegans, it has been reported that αKG modulates longevity by inhibiting TOR signaling (Chin et al., 2014) and that oxaloacetate increases lifespan through an AMPK/FOXO-dependent pathway (Williams et al., 2009). The effect of αKG on lifespan has recently been independently documented in flies (Su et al., 2019), and, more recently, in mice (Asadi Shahmirzadi et al., 2020), suggesting a conserved role for αKG in modulation of aging. Published data in Drosophila suggest that supplementation of αKG to a standard laboratory diet increased transcript abundance of AMPK and FOXO and reduces that of TOR (Su et al., 2019). However, our data indicate that neither FOXO (Figure 1—figure supplement 2) nor TOR (Figure 1—figure supplement 3) signaling is involved in the effects of dietary choice on lifespan, suggesting that αKG may recruit different mechanisms in this environment. Perhaps instead of energy sensing pathways, metabolic enzymes that control the branch point of crucial reactions (such as GDH) are more relevant in the context of a choice environment (Smith et al., 2019).

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

We propose the idea that the effects of dietary choice may result from metabolic changes stimulated by an alteration in metabolic state induced by the need to continuously evaluate macronutrient availability against physiological demand, which would not exist in a fixed-diet environment. Flies housed in a choice environment, for example, are allowed to interact with each macronutrient individually, and this behavior would be expected to result in the sequential activation of sugar and protein sensing pathways. Flies exposed to a complete, fixed diet would only experience nutrients simultaneously. The perceived flavor of each macronutrient may be different when yeast and sugar are consumed separately compared to when they are paired together on a fixed diet (Ahn et al., 2011) and that may also influence lifespan and metabolism (Ostojic et al., 2014). Notably, when given a choice, flies consumed more sugar than yeast but spent the majority of time physically on the yeast food. Loss of 5-HT2A did not alter these behaviors, establishing that control flies are capable of recognizing the components of a choice diet and that animals lacking 5-HT2A retain this ability.

Perhaps the act of decision-making per se is costly? In nature, decisions are made continuously following evaluation of environmental resources to allow animals to adjust their behavior in a way that would maximize their fitness (Galef, 1996; Lima, 1998). In humans, an abundance of choices can be stressful, which is thought to reflect the perceived risk of making a bad choice and therefore losing out on other, more valuable resources (Schwartz, 2004; Inbar et al., 2011). Although acute stress can be beneficial (Dhabhar et al., 2012), chronic stress is often detrimental to lifespan and health (Epel et al., 2004; Glaser and Kiecolt-Glaser, 2005; Lupien et al., 2009). Drosophila exhibit stress-related behaviors that are mediated by neuronal signaling pathways that are conserved in mice and humans, including serotonin signaling (Yang et al., 2013; Sachs et al., 2015; Mohammad et al., 2016; Ries et al., 2017). It seems reasonable, therefore, to consider the possibility that 5-HT2A influences metabolic decisions in response to the perception or consumption of individual nutrients in ways that are important for aging. Biogenic amines, including serotonin and dopamine, have been shown to encode protein hunger and reward (Ribeiro and Dickson, 2010; Vargas et al., 2010; Ro et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017), and serotonin receptor 5-HT2A has been implicated in mammalian stress (Weisstaub et al., 2006; Sachs et al., 2015) and in a putatively stressful situation in flies in which prolonged sight of dead conspecifics increases mortality and shortens lifespan (Chakraborty et al., 2019). Notably, a recent study in mice reported that unknown characteristics of each meal modulate aging independent of dietary composition or calories (Mitchell et al., 2019), suggesting that how animals recognize, interact with, or interpret their food may be a mechanism of aging that is conserved across taxa.

Source data for all quantifications shown in Data Figures 1-5, figures supplements and the supplementary files are provided with the paper. Metabolomic raw data, analyses and statistics can be obtained from Supplementary Files 3-4 and our GitHub repository (http://github.com/ylyu-fly/Metabolomics-FlyChoiceDiet). Copy archived at https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:rev:86daef110d9a1eb27262bc5310b54cc2d315f7c1/.

1. 1. Lyu Y
   2. Promislow DEL
   3. Pletcher SD

   (2016) Supplementary data

   ID FlyChoiceDiet. Head and body metabolomes in response to nutrient choice.

   https://github.com/ylyu-fly/Metabolomics-FlyChoiceDiet

1. 1. Ahn YY
   2. Ahnert SE
   3. Bagrow JP
   4. Barabási AL

   (2011) Flavor network and the principles of food pairing

   Scientific Reports 1:196.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00196

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Asadi Shahmirzadi A
   2. Edgar D
   3. Liao CY
   4. Hsu YM
   5. Lucanic M
   6. Asadi Shahmirzadi A
   7. Wiley CD
   8. Gan G
   9. Kim DE
   10. Kasler HG
   11. Kuehnemann C
   12. Kaplowitz B
   13. Bhaumik D
   14. Riley RR
   15. Kennedy BK
   16. Lithgow GJ

   (2020) Alpha-Ketoglutarate, an endogenous metabolite, extends lifespan and compresses morbidity in aging mice

   Cell Metabolism 32:447–456.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2020.08.004

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Avondo M
   2. Pagano RI
   3. De Angelis A
   4. Pennisi P

   (2013) Diet choice by goats as effect of milk production level during late lactation

   Animal 7:1113–1118.

   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000244

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Barger JL
   2. Kayo T
   3. Vann JM
   4. Arias EB
   5. Wang J
   6. Hacker TA
   7. Wang Y
   8. Raederstorff D
   9. Morrow JD
   10. Leeuwenburgh C
   11. Allison DB
   12. Saupe KW
   13. Cartee GD
   14. Weindruch R
   15. Prolla TA

   (2008) A low dose of dietary resveratrol partially mimics caloric restriction and retards aging parameters in mice

   PLOS ONE 3:e2264.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002264

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bruce KD
   2. Hoxha S
   3. Carvalho GB
   4. Yamada R
   5. Wang HD
   6. Karayan P
   7. He S
   8. Brummel T
   9. Kapahi P
   10. Ja WW

   (2013) High carbohydrate-low protein consumption maximizes Drosophila lifespan

   Experimental Gerontology 48:1129–1135.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2013.02.003

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bunning H
   2. Bassett L
   3. Clowser C
   4. Rapkin J
   5. Jensen K
   6. House CM
   7. Archer CR
   8. Hunt J

   (2016) Dietary choice for a balanced nutrient intake increases the mean and reduces the variance in the reproductive performance of male and female cockroaches

   Ecology and Evolution 6:4711–4730.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2243

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Camus MF
   2. Piper MD
   3. Reuter M

   (2019) Sex-specific transcriptomic responses to changes in the nutritional environment

   eLife 8:e47262.

   https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47262

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Carvalho GB
   2. Drago I
   3. Hoxha S
   4. Yamada R
   5. Mahneva O
   6. Bruce KD
   7. Soto Obando A
   8. Conti B
   9. Ja WW

   (2017) The 4E-BP growth pathway regulates the effect of ambient temperature on Drosophila metabolism and lifespan

   PNAS 114:9737–9742.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618994114

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Chakraborty TS
   2. Gendron CM
   3. Lyu Y
   4. Munneke AS
   5. DeMarco MN
   6. Hoisington ZW
   7. Pletcher SD

   (2019) Sensory perception of dead conspecifics induces aversive cues and modulates lifespan through serotonin in Drosophila

   Nature Communications 10:2365.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10285-y

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Chapman T
    2. Partridge L

    (1996) Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: An interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males

    Proceedings. Biological Sciences 263:755–759.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0113

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Chen D

    (2005) Increase in activity during calorie restriction requires Sirt1

    Science 310:1641.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1118357

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Chin RM
    2. Fu X
    3. Pai MY
    4. Vergnes L
    5. Hwang H
    6. Deng G
    7. Diep S
    8. Lomenick B
    9. Meli VS
    10. Monsalve GC
    11. Hu E
    12. Whelan SA
    13. Wang JX
    14. Jung G
    15. Solis GM
    16. Fazlollahi F
    17. Kaweeteerawat C
    18. Quach A
    19. Nili M
    20. Krall AS
    21. Godwin HA
    22. Chang HR
    23. Faull KF
    24. Guo F
    25. Jiang M
    26. Trauger SA
    27. Saghatelian A
    28. Braas D
    29. Christofk HR
    30. Clarke CF
    31. Teitell MA
    32. Petrascheck M
    33. Reue K
    34. Jung ME
    35. Frand AR
    36. Huang J

    (2014) The metabolite α-ketoglutarate extends lifespan by inhibiting ATP synthase and TOR

    Nature 510:397–401.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13264

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Chippindale AK
    2. Leroi AM
    3. Kim SB
    4. Rose MR

    (1993) Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life-history evolution I nutrition and the cost of reproduction

    Journal of Evolutionary Biology 6:171–193.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1993.6020171.x

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Contestabile A

    (2009) Benefits of caloric restriction on brain aging and related pathological states: understanding mechanisms to devise novel therapies

    Current Medicinal Chemistry 16:350–361.

    https://doi.org/10.2174/092986709787002637

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Corrales-Carvajal VM
    2. Faisal AA
    3. Ribeiro C

    (2016) Internal states drive nutrient homeostasis by modulating exploration-exploitation trade-off

    eLife 5:e19920.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19920

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Csata E
    2. Gautrais J
    3. Bach A
    4. Blanchet J
    5. Ferrante J
    6. Fournier F
    7. Lévesque T
    8. Simpson SJ
    9. Dussutour A

    (2020) Ant foragers compensate for the nutritional deficiencies in the colony

    Current Biology 30:135–142.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Devineni AV
    2. Heberlein U

    (2009) Preferential ethanol consumption in Drosophila models features of addiction

    Current Biology 19:2126–2132.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.070

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Dhabhar FS
    2. Malarkey WB
    3. Neri E
    4. McEwen BS

    (2012) Stress-induced redistribution of immune cells--from barracks to boulevards to battlefields: a tale of three hormones--curt richter award winner

    Psychoneuroendocrinology 37:1345–1368.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.05.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Dobson AJ
    2. Ezcurra M
    3. Flanagan CE
    4. Summerfield AC
    5. Piper MDW
    6. Gems D
    7. Alic N

    (2017) Nutritional programming of lifespan by FOXO inhibition on Sugar-Rich diets

    Cell Reports 18:299–306.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.029

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Epel ES
    2. Blackburn EH
    3. Lin J
    4. Dhabhar FS
    5. Adler NE
    6. Morrow JD
    7. Cawthon RM

    (2004) Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress

    PNAS 101:17312–17315.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407162101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Fontana L
    2. Partridge L

    (2015) Promoting health and longevity through diet: from model organisms to humans

    Cell 161:106–118.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.020

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Galef BG

    (1996) Food selection: problems in understanding how we choose foods to eat

    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 20:67–73.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7634(95)00041-c

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Gasque G
    2. Conway S
    3. Huang J
    4. Rao Y
    5. Vosshall LB

    (2013) Small molecule drug screening in Drosophila identifies the 5HT2a receptor as a feeding modulation target

    Scientific Reports 3:srep02120.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02120

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Glaser R
    2. Kiecolt-Glaser JK

    (2005) Stress-induced immune dysfunction: implications for health

    Nature Reviews. Immunology 5:243–251.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1571

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Gnerer JP
    2. Venken KJ
    3. Dierick HA

    (2015) Gene-specific cell labeling using MiMIC transposons

    Nucleic Acids Research 43:e56.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv113

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Harris DT
    2. Kallman BR
    3. Mullaney BC
    4. Scott K

    (2015) Representations of taste modality in the Drosophila brain

    Neuron 86:1449–1460.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.026

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Hoffman JM
    2. Lyu Y
    3. Pletcher SD
    4. Promislow DEL

    (2017) Proteomics and metabolomics in ageing research: from biomarkers to systems biology

    Essays in Biochemistry 61:379–388.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20160083

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Howard CE
    2. Chen CL
    3. Tabachnik T
    4. Hormigo R
    5. Ramdya P
    6. Mann RS

    (2019) Serotonergic modulation of walking in Drosophila

    Current Biology 29:4218–4230.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.042

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Hudry B
    2. de Goeij E
    3. Mineo A
    4. Gaspar P
    5. Hadjieconomou D
    6. Studd C
    7. Mokochinski JB
    8. Kramer HB
    9. Plaçais PY
    10. Preat T
    11. Miguel-Aliaga I

    (2019) Sex differences in intestinal carbohydrate metabolism promote food intake and sperm maturation

    Cell 178:901–918.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.029

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Inbar Y
    2. Botti S
    3. Hanko K

    (2011) Decision speed and choice regret: when haste feels like waste

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47:533–540.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.011

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Jensen K
    2. McClure C
    3. Priest NK
    4. Hunt J

    (2015) Sex-specific effects of protein and carbohydrate intake on reproduction but not lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster

    Aging Cell 14:605–615.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12333

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Jin K
    2. Wilson KA
    3. Beck JN
    4. Nelson CS
    5. Brownridge GW
    6. Harrison BR
    7. Djukovic D
    8. Raftery D
    9. Brem RB
    10. Yu S
    11. Drton M
    12. Shojaie A
    13. Kapahi P
    14. Promislow D

    (2020) Genetic and metabolomic architecture of variation in diet restriction-mediated lifespan extension in Drosophila

    PLOS Genetics 16:e1008835.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008835

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Lee KP
    2. Simpson SJ
    3. Clissold FJ
    4. Brooks R
    5. Ballard JW
    6. Taylor PW
    7. Soran N
    8. Raubenheimer D

    (2008) Lifespan and reproduction in Drosophila: new insights from nutritional geometry

    PNAS 105:2498–2503.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710787105

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Lima SL

    (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives

    Advances in the Study of Behavior 6:215–290.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60366-6

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Linford NJ
    2. Bilgir C
    3. Ro J
    4. Pletcher SD

    (2013) Measurement of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster

    Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE 7:50068.

    https://doi.org/10.3791/50068

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Linford NJ
    2. Ro J
    3. Chung BY
    4. Pletcher SD

    (2015) Gustatory and metabolic perception of nutrient stress in Drosophila

    PNAS 112:2587–2592.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1401501112

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Liu Q
    2. Tabuchi M
    3. Liu S
    4. Kodama L
    5. Horiuchi W
    6. Daniels J
    7. Chiu L
    8. Baldoni D
    9. Wu MN

    (2017) Branch-specific plasticity of a bifunctional dopamine circuit encodes protein hunger

    Science 356:534–539.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3245

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Longo VD
    2. Finch CE

    (2003) Evolutionary medicine: from dwarf model systems to healthy centenarians?

    Science 299:1342–1346.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1077991

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Lupien SJ
    2. McEwen BS
    3. Gunnar MR
    4. Heim C

    (2009) Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10:434–445.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2639

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. Software

    1. Lyu Y

    (2021) Metabolomics-FlyChoiceDiet, version swh:1:rev:86daef110d9a1eb27262bc5310b54cc2d315f7c1

    Software Heritage.

    https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:c484fa61635ab64cfbb190cff295b0f37edf5831;origin=http://github.com/ylyu-fly/Metabolomics-FlyChoiceDiet;visit=swh:1:snp:1eb486b935e0ff881345d3e3119ab661758676ae;anchor=swh:1:rev:86daef110d9a1eb27262bc5310b54cc2d315f7c1/
41. 1. Mair W
    2. Goymer P
    3. Pletcher SD
    4. Partridge L

    (2003) Demography of dietary restriction and death in Drosophila

    Science 301:1731–1733.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1086016

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Mair W
    2. Piper MD
    3. Partridge L

    (2005) Calories do not explain extension of life span by dietary restriction in Drosophila

    PLOS Biology 3:e223.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030223

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Masoro EJ

    (2005) Overview of caloric restriction and ageing

    Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 126:913–922.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2005.03.012

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Mayntz D
    2. Raubenheimer D
    3. Salomon M
    4. Toft S
    5. Simpson SJ

    (2005) Nutrient-specific foraging in invertebrate predators

    Science 307:111–113.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1105493

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. McCay CM
    2. Crowell MF
    3. Maynard LA

    (1935) The effect of retarded growth upon the length of life span and upon the ultimate body size

    The Journal of Nutrition 10:63–79.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/10.1.63

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Mitchell SJ
    2. Bernier M
    3. Mattison JA
    4. Aon MA
    5. Kaiser TA
    6. Anson RM
    7. Ikeno Y
    8. Anderson RM
    9. Ingram DK
    10. de Cabo R

    (2019) Daily fasting improves health and survival in male mice independent of diet composition and calories

    Cell Metabolism 29:221–228.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.08.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Mohammad F
    2. Aryal S
    3. Ho J
    4. Stewart JC
    5. Norman NA
    6. Tan TL
    7. Eisaka A
    8. Claridge-Chang A

    (2016) Ancient anxiety pathways influence Drosophila Defense Behaviors

    Current Biology 26:981–986.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.031

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Nichols CD

    (2007) 5-HT2 receptors in Drosophila are expressed in the brain and modulate aspects of circadian behaviors

    Developmental Neurobiology 67:752–763.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20370

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Ostojic I
    2. Boll W
    3. Waterson MJ
    4. Chan T
    5. Chandra R
    6. Pletcher SD
    7. Alcedo J

    (2014) Positive and negative gustatory inputs affect Drosophila lifespan partly in parallel to dFOXO signaling

    PNAS 111:8143–8148.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315466111

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Pang Z
    2. Chong J
    3. Li S
    4. Xia J

    (2020) MetaboAnalystR 3.0: toward an optimized workflow for global metabolomics

    Metabolites 10:186.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10050186

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Partridge L
    2. Pletcher SD
    3. Mair W

    (2005) Dietary restriction, mortality trajectories, risk and damage

    Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 126:35–41.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2004.09.017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Regan JC
    2. Khericha M
    3. Dobson AJ
    4. Bolukbasi E
    5. Rattanavirotkul N
    6. Partridge L

    (2016) Sex difference in pathology of the ageing gut mediates the greater response of female lifespan to dietary restriction

    eLife 5:e10956.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10956

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Rera M
    2. Clark RI
    3. Walker DW

    (2012) Intestinal barrier dysfunction links metabolic and inflammatory markers of aging to death in Drosophila

    PNAS 109:21528–21533.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215849110

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Ribeiro C
    2. Dickson BJ

    (2010) Sex peptide receptor and neuronal TOR/S6K signaling modulate nutrient balancing in Drosophila

    Current Biology 20:1000–1005.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.061

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Ries AS
    2. Hermanns T
    3. Poeck B
    4. Strauss R

    (2017) Serotonin modulates a depression-like state in Drosophila responsive to lithium treatment

    Nature Communications 8:15738.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15738

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Ro J
    2. Harvanek ZM
    3. Pletcher SD

    (2014) FLIC: high-throughput, continuous analysis of feeding behaviors in Drosophila

    PLOS ONE 9:e101107.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101107

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Ro J
    2. Pak G
    3. Malec PA
    4. Lyu Y
    5. Allison DB
    6. Kennedy RT
    7. Pletcher SD

    (2016) Serotonin signaling mediates protein valuation and aging

    eLife 5:e16843.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16843

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Roman G
    2. Endo K
    3. Zong L
    4. Davis RL

    (2001) P[Switch], a system for spatial and temporal control of gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster

    PNAS 98:12602–12607.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.221303998

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Sachs BD
    2. Ni JR
    3. Caron MG

    (2015) Brain 5-HT deficiency increases stress vulnerability and impairs antidepressant responses following psychosocial stress

    PNAS 112:2557–2562.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416866112

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. Book

    1. Schwartz B

    (2004)

    The Paradox of Choice: Why Less Is More

    New York Ecco.

    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Sestakova N
    2. Puzserova A
    3. Kluknavsky M
    4. Bernatova I

    (2013) Determination of motor activity and anxiety-related behaviour in rodents: methodological aspects and role of nitric oxide

    Interdisciplinary Toxicology 6:126–135.

    https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2013-0020

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Shell BC
    2. Schmitt RE
    3. Lee KM
    4. Johnson JC
    5. Chung BY
    6. Pletcher SD
    7. Grotewiel M

    (2018) Measurement of solid food intake in Drosophila via consumption-excretion of a dye tracer

    Scientific Reports 8:11536.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29813-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Shohat-Ophir G
    2. Kaun KR
    3. Azanchi R
    4. Mohammed H
    5. Heberlein U

    (2012) Sexual deprivation increases ethanol intake in Drosophila

    Science 335:1351–1355.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215932

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Skorupa DA
    2. Dervisefendic A
    3. Zwiener J
    4. Pletcher SD

    (2008) Dietary composition specifies consumption, obesity, and lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster

    Aging Cell 7:478–490.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00400.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Smith HQ
    2. Li C
    3. Stanley CA
    4. Smith TJ

    (2019) Glutamate dehydrogenase, a complex enzyme at a crucial metabolic branch point

    Neurochemical Research 44:117–132.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-017-2428-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Solon-Biet SM
    2. McMahon AC
    3. Ballard JW
    4. Ruohonen K
    5. Wu LE
    6. Cogger VC
    7. Warren A
    8. Huang X
    9. Pichaud N
    10. Melvin RG
    11. Gokarn R
    12. Khalil M
    13. Turner N
    14. Cooney GJ
    15. Sinclair DA
    16. Raubenheimer D
    17. Le Couteur DG
    18. Simpson SJ

    (2014) The ratio of macronutrients, not caloric intake, dictates cardiometabolic health, aging, and longevity in ad libitum-fed mice

    Cell Metabolism 19:418–430.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2014.02.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Starzec JJ
    2. Berger DF
    3. Mason EB
    4. DeVito W
    5. Corso C

    (1981) The effects of differential psychological stress and infantile handling on plasma triglyceride and aortic cholesterol levels in rats

    Psychosomatic Medicine 43:509–518.

    https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-198112000-00007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Starzec JJ
    2. Berger DF

    (1986) Effects of stress and ovariectomy on the plasma cholesterol, serum triglyceride, and aortic cholesterol levels of female rats

    Physiology & Behavior 37:99–104.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(86)90390-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Steck K
    2. Walker SJ
    3. Itskov PM
    4. Baltazar C
    5. Moreira JM
    6. Ribeiro C

    (2018) Internal amino acid state modulates yeast taste neurons to support protein homeostasis in Drosophila

    eLife 7:e31625.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31625

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Steenfeldt S
    2. Sørensen P
    3. Nielsen BL

    (2019) Effects of choice feeding and lower ambient temperature on feed intake, growth, foot health, and panting of fast- and slow-growing broiler strains

    Poultry Science 98:503–513.

    https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey323

    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Strekalova T
    2. Spanagel R
    3. Dolgov O
    4. Bartsch D

    (2005) Stress-induced hyperlocomotion as a confounding factor in anxiety and depression models in mice

    Behavioural Pharmacology 16:171–180.

    https://doi.org/10.1097/00008877-200505000-00006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Su Y
    2. Wang T
    3. Wu N
    4. Li D
    5. Fan X
    6. Xu Z
    7. Mishra SK
    8. Yang M

    (2019) Alpha-ketoglutarate extends Drosophila lifespan by inhibiting mTOR and activating AMPK

    Aging 11:4183–4197.

    https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.102045

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Talbert ME
    2. Barnett B
    3. Hoff R
    4. Amella M
    5. Kuczynski K
    6. Lavington E
    7. Koury S
    8. Brud E
    9. Eanes WF

    (2015) Genetic perturbation of key central metabolic genes extends lifespan in Drosophila and affects response to dietary restriction

    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282:20151646.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1646

    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Tatar M
    2. Post S
    3. Yu K

    (2014) Nutrient control of Drosophila longevity

    Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 25:509–517.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2014.02.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Vargas MA
    2. Luo N
    3. Yamaguchi A
    4. Kapahi P

    (2010) A role for S6 kinase and serotonin in postmating dietary switch and balance of nutrients in D. melanogaster

    Current Biology 20:1006–1011.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Vaupel JW
    2. Yashin AI

    (1985)

    "Heterogeneity's ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics."

    The American Statistician 39:176–185.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Waterson MJ
    2. Chung BY
    3. Harvanek ZM
    4. Ostojic I
    5. Alcedo J
    6. Pletcher SD

    (2014) Water sensor ppk28 modulates Drosophila lifespan and physiology through AKH signaling

    PNAS 111:8137–8142.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315461111

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Weed JL
    2. Lane MA
    3. Roth GS
    4. Speer DL
    5. Ingram DK

    (1997) Activity measures in rhesus monkeys on long-term calorie restriction

    Physiology & Behavior 62:97–103.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(97)00147-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Weindruch R
    2. Walford RL
    3. Fligiel S
    4. Guthrie D

    (1986) The retardation of aging in mice by dietary restriction: longevity, Cancer, immunity and lifetime energy intake

    The Journal of Nutrition 116:641–654.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/116.4.641

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Weindruch R
    2. Walford RL

    (1982) Dietary restriction in mice beginning at 1 year of age: effect on life-span and spontaneous Cancer incidence

    Science 215:1415–1418.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7063854

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. Book

    1. Weindruch R
    2. Walford RL

    (1988)

    Retardation of Aging and Disease by Dietary Restriction

    CC Thomas.

    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Weiss LA
    2. Dahanukar A
    3. Kwon JY
    4. Banerjee D
    5. Carlson JR

    (2011) The molecular and cellular basis of bitter taste in Drosophila

    Neuron 69:258–272.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Weisstaub NV
    2. Zhou M
    3. Lira A
    4. Lambe E
    5. González-Maeso J
    6. Hornung JP
    7. Sibille E
    8. Underwood M
    9. Itohara S
    10. Dauer WT
    11. Ansorge MS
    12. Morelli E
    13. Mann JJ
    14. Toth M
    15. Aghajanian G
    16. Sealfon SC
    17. Hen R
    18. Gingrich JA

    (2006) Cortical 5-HT2A receptor signaling modulates anxiety-like behaviors in mice

    Science 313:536–540.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123432

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Williams DS
    2. Cash A
    3. Hamadani L
    4. Diemer T

    (2009) Oxaloacetate supplementation increases lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans through an AMPK/FOXO-dependent pathway

    Aging Cell 8:765–768.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00527.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Yang Z
    2. Bertolucci F
    3. Wolf R
    4. Heisenberg M

    (2013) Flies cope with uncontrollable stress by learned helplessness

    Current Biology 23:799–803.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.054

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Yang Z
    2. Yu Y
    3. Zhang V
    4. Tian Y
    5. Qi W
    6. Wang L

    (2015) Octopamine mediates starvation-induced hyperactivity in adult Drosophila

    PNAS 112:5219–5224.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417838112

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Yang Lyu

   Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology and Geriatrics Center, Biomedical Sciences and Research Building, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Formal analysis, Resources, Data curation, Software, Methodology, Project administration, Writing-original draft, Writing - review and editing, Funding acquisition

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4618-9043

2. Kristina J Weaver

   Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology and Geriatrics Center, Biomedical Sciences and Research Building, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Funding acquisition

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Humza A Shaukat

   College of Literature, Science, and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States

   Contribution

   Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Marta L Plumoff

   College of Literature, Science, and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States

   Contribution

   Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Maria Tjilos

   College of Literature, Science, and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States

   Contribution

   Investigation, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Daniel EL Promislow

   1. Department of Lab Medicine & Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, United States
   2. Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States

   Contribution

   Resources, Software, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Scott D Pletcher

   Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology and Geriatrics Center, Biomedical Sciences and Research Building, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Formal analysis, Resources, Data curation, Software, Methodology, Project administration, Writing-original draft, Writing - review and editing, Funding acquisition

   For correspondence

   spletch@med.umich.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4812-3785

• 4,174

  views

• 421

  downloads

• 14

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.