As in Lymnaea stagnalis NPY plays a key role in regulating energy flows but has no effect on food intake, two important questions arise: 1) How is the amount of food consumed related to energy storage? 2) Can we give a molecular explanation for this alteration in function of NPY during evolution? Recent data have shown that also in Lymnaea a leptin-like factor is produced by glycogen storing cells which inhibits food intake, a Lymnaea storage feedback factor (LySFF). So, food consumption seems in balance with the amount of energy stored in this animal. We suppose that NPY neurons in Lymnaea have receptors for LySFF so that their activity in regulating energy homeostasis reflects the amount of stored energy. By comparing the molecular structure of NPYs in invertebrates it became clear that only molluscan and arthropod NPY are synthesized from a prohormone similar to vertebrate NPYs and should be considered as real invertebrate homologs of NPY. Based on pharmacological data we suppose that the identified Lymnaea NPY receptor is a Y1 subtype. This might explain that LyNPY has no effect on food intake in Lymnaea as this function of NPY in mammals is regulated through the Y5 subtype receptor.