Exploring the limits of codon and anticodon size

Chem Biol. 2002 Feb;9(2):237-44. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(02)00094-7.

Abstract

We previously employed a combinatorial approach to identify the most efficient suppressors of four-base codons in E. coli. We have now examined the suppression of two-, three-, four-, five-, and six-base codons with tRNAs containing 6-10 nt in their anticodon loops. We found that the E. coli translational machinery tolerates codons of 3-5 bases and that tRNAs with 6-10 nt anticodon loops can suppress these codons. However, N-length codons were found to prefer N + 4-length anticodon loops. Additionally, sequence preferences, including the requirement of Watson-Crick complementarity to the codon, were evident in the loops. These selections have yielded efficient suppressors of four-base and five-base codons for our ongoing efforts to expand the genetic code. They also highlight some of the parameters that underlie the fidelity of frame maintenance.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Anticodon / genetics*
  • Codon / genetics*
  • Escherichia coli / genetics*
  • Frameshifting, Ribosomal
  • Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
  • Gene Library
  • Genetic Code / genetics*
  • Protein Biosynthesis
  • RNA, Transfer / genetics
  • Suppression, Genetic

Substances

  • Anticodon
  • Codon
  • RNA, Transfer