1H-NMR studies on a potent and selective antagonist at human melanocortin receptor 4 (hMC-4R)

Melanocortin receptor 4 (MC-4R) is involved in the regulation of energy balance and body weight, and recognizes alpha-, beta-, and gamma-melanocyte stimulating hormones (alpha-, beta-, gamma-MSH). In the search for compounds that regulate food intake and body weight, two synthetic lactam-derivative ligands of alpha-MSH were discovered, MTII and SHU9119. MTII is an agonist and reduces food intake in rats, whereas SHU9119 is an antagonist, and increases food intake and body weight in rats. MTII and SHU9119 are nonselective compounds to MC-4R. To enhance the potency and selectivity at the human MC-4R (hMC-4R), we recently synthesized analogs of SHU9119 (M. A. Bednarek, T. MacNeil, R. N. Kalyani, R. Tang, Van der L. H. T. Ploeg, and D. H. Weinberg, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2001, Vol. 44, pp. 401-409), wherein compound 1 was the most selective for hMC-4R. Replacement of D-Nal by L-Nal in compound 1 made compound 2 weakly active. Comparison of the structures by NMR and molecular modeling of compounds 1 and 2 vs SHU9119 and MTII indicated that, even though they existed as an average of several conformations in solution, there were distinctions in their structures. The gamma-methylene protons of Arg in compound 1 were nonequivalent and shielded probably by the aromatic ring of Nal. The NHi-NHi+1 NOE cross peaks and the temperature coefficients of the amide protons around the "essential core" Nal/Phe7-Arg8-Trp9, required for high affinity and high selectivity at hMC-4R, were indicative of a possible turn structure for these compounds but with differences in their NOE strengths and temperature coefficient values. Molecular modeling of these compounds based on their NMR data showed that the essential core appeared as a "V" shape with two different orientations, one for compound 1 and some of the conformers of SHU9119 and MTII, and the other for compound 2 and some other conformers of SHU9119 and MTII. The remaining conformers of SHU9119 and MTII, which did not map to compound 1 or 2, suggested that they were outside of the hMC-4R binding envelop. These observations may lead to conjectures as to why compound 1 is highly active and selective toward hMC-4R.