Our previous work has shown that male Wistar rats, although identical in breeder, age and housing conditions, can differ systematically in their anxiety-related behavior as measured in the elevated plus-maze. Since such individual dispositions can affect the responsiveness in other aversively motivated situations, we asked in a 1st experiment whether such rats might also differ in a test of conditioned fear. Based on their levels of spontaneous open arm avoidance in the elevated plus-maze, 20 adult male Wistar rats were divided into those with "high open arm" (HOA) versus "low open arm" (LOA) time. These rats were then tested in a standard fear conditioning paradigm. During the conditioning procedure, they received 6 tone (3 kHz, 20 s) and shock (0.5 mA, 0.5 s) pairings, each followed by a 60 s inter-stimulus interval. Conditioned responses to the tone were tested 24 h thereafter. During both days, freezing behavior and ultrasonic vocalization were measured. Differences in ultrasonic vocalization between HOA and LOA rats were detected during the conditioning day, where vocalization was more likely in LOA rats. Furthermore, LOA rats emitted calls with higher frequency components than HOA rats. On the subsequent day of testing, the number of animals vocalizing, and the rate of vocalization was decreased, and call differences between groups were no longer detectable. In freezing, differences between HOA and LOA rats were observed on the conditioning day, where LOA rats showed more freezing behavior during the tone/shock intervals. Also, on the test day, they showed more freezing behavior during the tone intervals compared to HOA rats. These results indicate that acute and conditioned responses of rats in a conventional fear conditioning paradigm can depend on individual dispositions of anxiety-related behavior as measured with the elevated plus-maze. In a 2nd experiment, we asked whether exposure to an elevated plus-maze would lead to ultrasonic vocalization, which we tested in rats which had been handled or non-handled prior to testing. Most importantly, we found that none of the animals displayed any vocalization in the plus-maze, neither during a 1st nor a repeated test 1 day later. These data are discussed with respect to the presumed role of ultrasonic vocalization in aversively motivated situations, and the mechanisms, which may account for the behavioral differences between HOA and LOA rats in such tests.