False-negative results in nucleic acid amplification tests-do we need to routinely use two genetic targets in all assays to overcome problems caused by sequence variation?

Crit Rev Microbiol. 2008;34(2):71-6. doi: 10.1080/10408410801960913.

Abstract

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have numerous advantages over traditional diagnostic techniques and so are now widely used by diagnostic laboratories for routine detection of infectious agents. However, there is some concern over the increasing numbers of reports of NAAT false-negative results caused by sequence variation. Highly conserved NAAT target sequences have been reported for many organisms, yet sequence-related problems continue to be observed in commercial and in-house assays targeting a broad range of microbial pathogens. In light of these ongoing problems, it may be time to consider the use of two genetic targets in NAAT methods to reduce the potential for sequence-related false-negative results.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Base Sequence
  • Communicable Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Communicable Diseases / microbiology
  • Communicable Diseases / virology
  • Genetic Variation*
  • Humans
  • Infections / drug therapy
  • Infections / microbiology
  • Infections / virology
  • Microbiological Techniques / methods
  • Microbiological Techniques / standards*
  • Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques / methods
  • Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques / standards*
  • Reference Standards