Process, not product: investigating recommendations for improving citizen science "success"

PLoS One. 2013 May 15;8(5):e64079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064079. Print 2013.

Abstract

Citizen science programs are increasingly popular for a variety of reasons, from public education to new opportunities for data collection. The literature published in scientific journals resulting from these projects represents a particular perspective on the process. These articles often conclude with recommendations for increasing "success". This study compared these recommendations to those elicited during interviews with program coordinators for programs within the United States. From this comparison, success cannot be unilaterally defined and therefore recommendations vary by perspective on success. Program coordinators tended to have more locally-tailored recommendations specific to particular aspects of their program mission.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Data Collection*
  • Humans
  • United States

Grants and funding

Funding was received from the Cornell University Department of Development Sociology discretionary funds. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.