Improvement of Postoperative Pain Control Processes and Outcomes in Veterans of a Surgical Intensive Care Unit

World J Surg. 2017 Feb;41(2):419-422. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3728-2.

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain remains undertreated in critically ill patients. We hypothesized that the adequacy of pain control in our Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) was above the reported average of 71 % in the literature and that the introduction of the critical care pain observation tool (CPOT) could improve it. We used a Lean Six Sigma methodology to improve our processes and quantify our improvement.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively review 713 consecutive veterans admitted to our SICU. Between December 2014 and February 2015, postoperative pain was assessed every 2 h and rated "acceptable," "unacceptable," or "unable to assess". Between March 2015 and October 2015, postoperative pain was assessed with CPOT. Concurrently, we implemented a postoperative pain education program and documented this activity in the electronic medical record.

Results: The baseline adequacy of pain control was 78 %, which improved to 99 % after the introduction of CPOT. We concurrently achieved a 100 % median documentation of postoperative pain education in the electronic medical record. The introduction of CPOT improved the process σ from 2.3 to 3.8. The process of documenting pain education achieved a process σ of 3.1.

Conclusions: The proportion of veterans with acceptable pain control in our SICU is higher than that reported in the literature and the application of a Six Sigma methodology that involved the introduction of the CPOT has allowed us to improve the perception of pain control and comply with the newest regulatory directives.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Boston
  • Critical Illness*
  • Female
  • Hospitals, Veterans
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain Measurement / methods*
  • Pain, Postoperative / prevention & control*
  • Retrospective Studies