Elsevier

Bioresource Technology

Volume 102, Issue 24, December 2011, Pages 11115-11120
Bioresource Technology

Short Communication
Effects of enzyme loading and β-glucosidase supplementation on enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass processed by leading pretreatment technologies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.085Get rights and content

Abstract

The objective of this work is to investigate the effects of cellulase loading and β-glucosidase supplementation on enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated Dacotah switchgrass. To assess the difference among various pretreatment methods, the profiles of sugars and intermediates were determined for differently treated substrates. For all pretreatments, 72 h glucan/xylan digestibilities increased sharply with enzyme loading up to 25 mg protein/g-glucan, after which the response varied depending on the pretreatment method. For a fixed level of enzyme loading, dilute sulfuric acid (DA), SO2, and Lime pretreatments exhibited higher digestibility than the soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA) and ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX). Supplementation of Novozyme-188 to Spezyme-CP improved the 72 h glucan digestibility only for the SAA treated samples. The effect of β-glucosidase supplementation was discernible only at the early phase of hydrolysis where accumulation of cellobiose and oligomers is significant. Addition of β-glucosidase increased the xylan digestibility of alkaline treated samples due to the β-xylosidase activity present in Novozyme-188.

Introduction

Lignocellulosic biomass is currently considered the most promising long-term feedstock for production of bioethanol. The recalcitrance of the feedstock is the major hurdle in the bioconversion process. In the plant cell structure, cellulose fibrils are embedded in a matrix of lignin and hemicellulose. This forms a chemical and structural barrier for enzymatic degradation of cell wall sugars and subsequent microbial fermentation to ethanol (Lynd et al., 2002, Kumar and Wyman, 2009). For cellulase enzymes to be able to effectively access the cellulose, the cell wall structure needs to be disrupted. Various pretreatment methods are employed by in order to remove these barriers. The pretreatment mode of action varies depending upon the method applied. Pretreatment often results in a change of composition, alteration of physical properties including cellulose crystallinity. The CAFI team has put forward a collaborative effort to examine some of the promising pretreatment technologies including: soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA), ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX), calcium hydroxide (Lime), liquid hot water (LHW), dilute sulfuric acid (DA), and SO2 (Wyman et al., 2005b).

The goal of this research as part of the CAFI project is to assess the enzyme requirement for various pretreatments and seek ways to reduce the enzyme loading. In many cases the required enzyme loading is too high to be economically feasible (Mosier et al., 2005, Kumar and Wyman, 2008a). Since the enzyme is one of the major costs involved in producing cellulosic ethanol, pretreatment advances are still needed to reduce the overall production costs (Wyman et al., 2005a). A typical cellulase enzyme mixture consists of many different enzymes that function synergistically to break down the cell wall polysaccharides. One of the key enzymes in the cellulase system is exo-glucanase which produces cellobiose as an intermediate product (Zhao et al., 2004). It is well known that cellobiose inhibits the action of exo-glucanase (Xiao et al., 2004). If the cellulase complex does not have sufficient β-glucosidase activity, external supplementation is necessary to increase the enzyme efficiency (Lynd et al., 2002). Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose also produces glucose and xylose oligomers as reaction intermediates. Although inhibition of cellulase activity by monomeric sugars and cellobiose is well documented (Kumar and Wyman, 2008a, Quing and Wyman, 2011), limited information is available with regard on the effect of oligomers. More detailed investigations are required to understand how the enzyme loading is influenced by pretreatment method and the type of substrate. The technical objective of this work is to investigate the effects of cellulase loading and β-glucosidase supplementation on production of monomeric and oligomeric sugars. Efforts were put forward to observe data over the entire duration of hydrolysis and to seek explanations for the difference in hydrolysis behavior, if any, among the substrates generated by various CAFI methods.

Section snippets

Feedstock

DSG was obtained from Ceres, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. DSG is of upland variety with thin stem morphology and was harvested in northeast South Dakota. The samples were initially milled to pass through a 0.25 inch screen and shipped to each participating university where they were stored at room temperature. Before the pretreatment, DSG was milled to pass through a 2 mm screen.

Pretreatment methods

The feedstock was pretreated by the CAFI team by their respective methods. The treatment conditions applied for this work

Composition of pretreated DSG

The composition of treated and untreated DSG samples is as follows:

PretreatmentGlucan (%)Xylan (%)Klason lignin (%)
Untreated35.021.821.4
SAA34.513.68.3
AFEX35.822.424.4
Lime34.514.610.3
LHW30.01.819.4
DA30.82.5917.8
SO233.62.515.8

All the samples were washed with cold water before analysis. Composition was calculated on the basis of untreated DSG. The highest percentage of delignification was achieved with SAA treatment (62%) among all the pretreatment methods. The DSG treated with alkaline reagents

Conclusion

For a fixed enzyme loading, DA, SO2, and Lime methods rendered higher 72 h digestibilities than the SAA or AFEX. Digestibility of DSG from acidic treatments sharply increase with enzyme loading up to 25 mg/g-glucan and leveled off. In alkaline and neutral treatments, sharp rise of digestibility was followed by further gradual increase with higher enzyme loading. Supplementation of β-glucosidase: (a) improved the glucan digestibility for SAA, (b) reduced the cellobiose and glucose oligomers at the

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Office of the Biomass Program of DOE (Contract: DE-FG36-07GO17102). We also wish to thank the members of CAFI team for their useful suggestions and collaboration, Genencor-Dansico (Paulo Alto, CA) for providing the enzymes used in this research and Ceres, Inc. (Thousand Oaks, CA) for providing switchgrass feedstocks.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (53)

  • Lignin peroxidase-a robust tool for biocatalysis

    2021, Nanomaterials for Biocatalysis
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text