Intracellular Antibodies (Intrabodies) versus RNA Interference for Therapeutic Applications

  1. Boon Chin Heng
  1. Stem Cell Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  1. Address correspondence to Dr. Boon Chin Heng, Stem Cell Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074; tel 656 874 4630; fax 65 6774 5701; e-mail denhenga{at}nus.edu.sg.
  • Received 12 April 2005.
  • Accepted 18 April 2005.

Abstract

Currently there are two technology platforms for the ablation of protein function: (a) RNAi-mediated gene-silencing at the post-transcriptional level, and (b) intrabody knockout of protein function at the post-translational level. Both approaches hold much promise for therapeutic applications. The pertinent question is how to choose between these alternative approaches. This commentary examines the advantages and disadvantages of these newly-emerging technology platforms. The RNAi approach is much less technically challenging than the intrabody-mediated knockout of protein function, but its major limitation is non-specificity. Although it is time-consuming and labor-intensive to generate intrabodies for specific intracellular protein targets, a much higher level of specificity can be attained. Ultimately, the choice between these strategies depend on the specific application in question, as well as on further technical advances in both technology platforms.

| Table of Contents