An extended set of yeast-based functional assays accurately identifies human disease mutations

  1. Frederick P. Roth1,2,3,4,7,9
  1. 1Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada;
  2. 2Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada;
  3. 3Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada;
  4. 4Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada;
  5. 5Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, SE-75123 Uppsala, Sweden;
  6. 6Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA;
  7. 7Center for Cancer Systems Biology (CCSB), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA;
  8. 8Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA;
  9. 9Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1Z8, Canada
  1. Corresponding author: fritz.roth{at}utoronto.ca
  • 10 Present address: Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Abstract

We can now routinely identify coding variants within individual human genomes. A pressing challenge is to determine which variants disrupt the function of disease-associated genes. Both experimental and computational methods exist to predict pathogenicity of human genetic variation. However, a systematic performance comparison between them has been lacking. Therefore, we developed and exploited a panel of 26 yeast-based functional complementation assays to measure the impact of 179 variants (101 disease- and 78 non-disease-associated variants) from 22 human disease genes. Using the resulting reference standard, we show that experimental functional assays in a 1-billion-year diverged model organism can identify pathogenic alleles with significantly higher precision and specificity than current computational methods.

Footnotes

  • [Supplemental material is available for this article.]

  • Article published online before print. Article, supplemental material, and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.192526.115.

  • Freely available online through the Genome Research Open Access option.

  • Received March 26, 2015.
  • Accepted March 8, 2016.

This article, published in Genome Research, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

| Table of Contents
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

Preprint Server