Modeling leaderless transcription and atypical genes results in more accurate gene prediction in prokaryotes

  1. Mark Borodovsky1,2,3,4,5
  1. 1Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA;
  2. 2Gene Probe, Incorporated, Atlanta, Georgia 30324, USA;
  3. 3School of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA;
  4. 4School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA;
  5. 5Department of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, 141700, Russia
  • Corresponding author: borodovsky{at}gatech.edu
  • Abstract

    In a conventional view of the prokaryotic genome organization, promoters precede operons and ribosome binding sites (RBSs) with Shine-Dalgarno consensus precede genes. However, recent experimental research suggesting a more diverse view motivated us to develop an algorithm with improved gene-finding accuracy. We describe GeneMarkS-2, an ab initio algorithm that uses a model derived by self-training for finding species-specific (native) genes, along with an array of precomputed “heuristic” models designed to identify harder-to-detect genes (likely horizontally transferred). Importantly, we designed GeneMarkS-2 to identify several types of distinct sequence patterns (signals) involved in gene expression control, among them the patterns characteristic for leaderless transcription as well as noncanonical RBS patterns. To assess the accuracy of GeneMarkS-2, we used genes validated by COG (Clusters of Orthologous Groups) annotation, proteomics experiments, and N-terminal protein sequencing. We observed that GeneMarkS-2 performed better on average in all accuracy measures when compared with the current state-of-the-art gene prediction tools. Furthermore, the screening of ∼5000 representative prokaryotic genomes made by GeneMarkS-2 predicted frequent leaderless transcription in both archaea and bacteria. We also observed that the RBS sites in some species with leadered transcription did not necessarily exhibit the Shine-Dalgarno consensus. The modeling of different types of sequence motifs regulating gene expression prompted a division of prokaryotic genomes into five categories with distinct sequence patterns around the gene starts.

    Footnotes

    • Received September 29, 2017.
    • Accepted May 16, 2018.

    This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

    | Table of Contents

    Preprint Server