Genomic architecture of adaptive color pattern divergence and convergence in Heliconius butterflies

  1. Brian A. Counterman8,10,11
  1. 1Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Republic of Panama;
  2. 2Biomathematics Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA;
  3. 3Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA;
  4. 4Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
  5. 5Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom;
  6. 6Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom;
  7. 7Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA;
  8. 8Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA;
  9. 9Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá DC, Colombia
    1. 10 These authors contributed equally to this work.

    Abstract

    Identifying the genetic changes driving adaptive variation in natural populations is key to understanding the origins of biodiversity. The mosaic of mimetic wing patterns in Heliconius butterflies makes an excellent system for exploring adaptive variation using next-generation sequencing. In this study, we use a combination of techniques to annotate the genomic interval modulating red color pattern variation, identify a narrow region responsible for adaptive divergence and convergence in Heliconius wing color patterns, and explore the evolutionary history of these adaptive alleles. We use whole genome resequencing from four hybrid zones between divergent color pattern races of Heliconius erato and two hybrid zones of the co-mimic Heliconius melpomene to examine genetic variation across 2.2 Mb of a partial reference sequence. In the intergenic region near optix, the gene previously shown to be responsible for the complex red pattern variation in Heliconius, population genetic analyses identify a shared 65-kb region of divergence that includes several sites perfectly associated with phenotype within each species. This region likely contains multiple cis-regulatory elements that control discrete expression domains of optix. The parallel signatures of genetic differentiation in H. erato and H. melpomene support a shared genetic architecture between the two distantly related co-mimics; however, phylogenetic analysis suggests mimetic patterns in each species evolved independently. Using a combination of next-generation sequencing analyses, we have refined our understanding of the genetic architecture of wing pattern variation in Heliconius and gained important insights into the evolution of novel adaptive phenotypes in natural populations.

    Footnotes

    • 11 Corresponding author

      E-mail bcounterman{at}biology.msstate.edu

    • [Supplemental material is available for this article.]

    • Article published online before print. Article, supplemental material, and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.150615.112.

    • Received October 15, 2012.
    • Accepted May 7, 2013.

    This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.

    | Table of Contents

    Preprint Server