Phase separation of Polycomb-repressive complex 1 is governed by a charged disordered region of CBX2

  1. Robert E. Kingston1,2
  1. 1Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA;
  2. 2Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA;
  3. 3Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA;
  4. 4Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA
  1. Corresponding author: kingston{at}molbio.mgh.harvard.edu
  1. 6 These authors contributed equally to this work.

  • 5 Present address: Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Abstract

Mammalian development requires effective mechanisms to repress genes whose expression would generate inappropriately specified cells. The Polycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1) family complexes are central to maintaining this repression. These include a set of canonical PRC1 complexes, each of which contains four core proteins, including one from the CBX family. These complexes have been shown previously to reside in membraneless organelles called Polycomb bodies, leading to speculation that canonical PRC1 might be found in a separate phase from the rest of the nucleus. We show here that reconstituted PRC1 readily phase-separates into droplets in vitro at low concentrations and physiological salt conditions. This behavior is driven by the CBX2 subunit. Point mutations in an internal domain of Cbx2 eliminate phase separation. These same point mutations eliminate the formation of puncta in cells and have been shown previously to eliminate nucleosome compaction in vitro and generate axial patterning defects in mice. Thus, the domain of CBX2 that is important for phase separation is the same domain shown previously to be important for chromatin compaction and proper development, raising the possibility of a mechanistic or evolutionary link between these activities.

Keywords

Footnotes

  • Received March 13, 2019.
  • Accepted May 8, 2019.

This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genesdev.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

| Table of Contents

Life Science Alliance