Numerical constraints and feedback control of double-strand breaks in mouse meiosis

  1. Scott Keeney1,7,9
  1. 1Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA;
  2. 2Research Programs Unit (Genome-Scale Biology),
  3. 3Institute of Biomedicine (Biochemistry and Developmental Biology), University of Helsinki, Helsinki FIN-00014, Finland;
  4. 4Developmental Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA;
  5. 5Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Section of Anatomy, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy;
  6. 6Institute of Human Genetics, UPR1142/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 34936 Montpellier CEDEX 5, France;
  7. 7Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA
    1. 8 These authors contributed equally to this work.

    Abstract

    Different organisms display widely different numbers of the programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate meiotic recombination (e.g., hundreds per meiocyte in mice and humans vs. dozens in nematodes), but little is known about what drives these species-specific DSB set points or the regulatory pathways that control them. Here we examine male mice with a lowered dosage of SPO11, the meiotic DSB catalyst, to gain insight into the effect of reduced DSB numbers on mammalian chromosome dynamics. An approximately twofold DSB reduction was associated with the reduced ability of homologs to synapse along their lengths, provoking prophase arrest and, ultimately, sterility. In many spermatocytes, chromosome subsets displayed a mix of synaptic failure and synapsis with both homologous and nonhomologous partners (“chromosome tangles”). The X chromosome was nearly always involved in tangles, and small autosomes were involved more often than large ones. We conclude that homolog pairing requirements dictate DSB set points during meiosis. Importantly, our results reveal that karyotype is a key factor: Smaller autosomes and heteromorphic sex chromosomes become weak links when DSBs are reduced below a critical threshold. Unexpectedly, unsynapsed chromosome segments trapped in tangles displayed an elevated density of DSB markers later in meiotic prophase. The unsynapsed portion of the X chromosome in wild-type males also showed evidence that DSB numbers increased as prophase progressed. These findings point to the existence of a feedback mechanism that links DSB number and distribution with interhomolog interactions.

    Keywords

    Footnotes

    • 9 Corresponding authors

      E-mail s-keeney{at}ski.mskcc.org

      E-mail m-jasin{at}ski.mskcc.org

    • Supplemental material is available for this article.

    • Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.213652.113.

    • Received January 9, 2013.
    • Accepted March 27, 2013.
    | Table of Contents

    Life Science Alliance