Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A new method for determining ribosomal DNA copy number shows differences between Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations

Diksha Sharma, Sylvie Hermann-Le Denmat, Nicholas J. Matzke, Katherine Hannan, Ross D. Hannan, View ORCID ProfileJustin M. O’Sullivan, View ORCID ProfileAusten R. D. Ganley
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.21.427686
Diksha Sharma
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sylvie Hermann-Le Denmat
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
2Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, F-75005 Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas J. Matzke
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Hannan
3ACRF Department of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, ACT 2601, Australia
4Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ross D. Hannan
3ACRF Department of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, ACT 2601, Australia
4Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
5Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
6Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia
7Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin M. O’Sullivan
8Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
9Maurice Wilkins Center, University of Auckland, New Zealand
10MRC Lifecourse Unit, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
11Brain Research New Zealand, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Justin M. O’Sullivan
Austen R. D. Ganley
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Austen R. D. Ganley
  • For correspondence: a.ganley@auckland.ac.nz
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Ribosomal DNA genes (rDNA) encode the major ribosomal RNAs (rRNA) and in eukaryotic genomes are typically present as one or more arrays of tandem repeats. Species have characteristic rDNA copy numbers, ranging from tens to thousands of copies, with the number thought to be redundant for rRNA production. However, the tandem rDNA repeats are prone to recombination-mediated changes in copy number, resulting in substantial intra-species copy number variation. There is growing evidence that these copy number differences can have phenotypic consequences. However, we lack a comprehensive understanding of what determines rDNA copy number, how it evolves, and what the consequences are, in part because of difficulties in quantifying copy number. Here, we developed a genomic sequence read approach that estimates rDNA copy number from the modal coverage of the rDNA and whole genome to help overcome limitations in quantifying copy number with existing mean coverage-based approaches. We validated our method using strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae with previously-determined rDNA copy numbers, and then applied our pipeline to investigate rDNA copy number in a global sample of 788 yeast isolates. We found that wild yeast have a mean copy number of 92, consistent with what is reported for other fungi but much lower than in laboratory strains. We show that different populations have different rDNA copy numbers. These differences can partially be explained by phylogeny, but other factors such as environment are also likely to contribute to population differences in copy number. Our results demonstrate the utility of the modal coverage method, and highlight the high level of rDNA copy number variation within and between populations.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 22, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A new method for determining ribosomal DNA copy number shows differences between Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A new method for determining ribosomal DNA copy number shows differences between Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations
Diksha Sharma, Sylvie Hermann-Le Denmat, Nicholas J. Matzke, Katherine Hannan, Ross D. Hannan, Justin M. O’Sullivan, Austen R. D. Ganley
bioRxiv 2021.01.21.427686; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.21.427686
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A new method for determining ribosomal DNA copy number shows differences between Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations
Diksha Sharma, Sylvie Hermann-Le Denmat, Nicholas J. Matzke, Katherine Hannan, Ross D. Hannan, Justin M. O’Sullivan, Austen R. D. Ganley
bioRxiv 2021.01.21.427686; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.21.427686

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4230)
  • Biochemistry (9123)
  • Bioengineering (6767)
  • Bioinformatics (23969)
  • Biophysics (12109)
  • Cancer Biology (9510)
  • Cell Biology (13753)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7623)
  • Ecology (11675)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15492)
  • Genetics (10632)
  • Genomics (14310)
  • Immunology (9473)
  • Microbiology (22823)
  • Molecular Biology (9086)
  • Neuroscience (48920)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1480)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2566)
  • Physiology (3841)
  • Plant Biology (8322)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1468)
  • Synthetic Biology (2295)
  • Systems Biology (6180)
  • Zoology (1299)