Abstract
Sequence homology between neurotoxins and the site encompassing the furin cleavage site 680SPRRAR685 in the spike protein (S) of CoV2 suggested that this site could interact with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). Molecular dynamics simulations confirm robust structural similarity between wild-type (WT) CoV2 and the binding motif of α-conotoxin to α9 nAChR, which is known to modulate IL-1β in immune cells. We show that the structural integrity of this binding motif is eliminated by Alpha P681H mutation, reemerged in Delta variant P681R, and disappeared again with Omicron N679H/P681H. Interactions between the toxin-mimic CoV2 motif and α9-nAChR are expected to trigger the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines an effect that is mollified by Alpha and Omicron. Clinical features of this interaction site are relevant because, contrary to most regions in the S protein, the furin binding site does not appear to trigger an immune response prior to cleavage, indicating that the cholinergic pathway should be activated in the respiratory tract and nasal mucosa where α9-nAChR co-localizes with the virus. The correlation of changes on this motif by the different variants closely matches the reported cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children by the CDC, and predicts significant mitigation of MIS-C with the Omicron variant. Our findings strongly motivate further study of this cholinergic pathway as one source of the cytokine storm triggered by CoV2.
Three years into the COVID-19 pandemic has brought little mechanistic understanding of the inflammatory pathways and cytokine storm triggered by the virus1,2. However, the relatively rapid appearance of new variants of SARS-CoV2 offers clues to how and why it is adapting3. Significant efforts are being devoted to understanding what makes the virus more infectious or transmissible4, and how it evolves to overcome a host’s immune response5. In the conventional paradigm of humoral immune responses, B cells recognize exposed conformational epitopes of protein antigens through interactions with surface expressed immunoglobulin receptors6. Based on sound thermodynamic principles, the stability of key structural motifs7 in these epitopes, and their availability8, or exposure, to bind are essential properties to understand the diverse humoral immune responses induced by relevant three-dimensional epitopes, as well as host-pathogen interactions9.
Significant among the multiple CoV2 mutations that have been fixated in the population is a unique proline located at P681 of the Spike (S) protein, which not only belongs to the most immunogenic of the epitopes of 2019 coronavirus disease patients10,11 that has been mutated in new variants but also forms part of the essential furin cleavage site 680SPRRAR←S1/S2→SVAS68912,13. Unique to CoV2, this site recruits furin for cleavage of S proteins into S1/S2, a process that is critical for the subsequent cleavage by TMPRSS2 at site S2’ to trigger cell fusion and viral entry4,14. Variants of concern (VOC) of CoV2 have mutated this amino acid twice: Alpha and Omicron (P681H) and Delta (P681R). The site is in a flexible loop of S15, making the proline mutation viable. Intriguingly, high immunogenicity at this epitope has only been observed at the C-end terminal of the S1, while no antigenicity has yet been reported neither for the intact nor for the N-terminal end of S210,11.
Independently, based in part on reports of low smoking prevalence among hospitalized COVID-19 patients16, the well-established role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in inflamation17, and a distant sequence similarity between a neurotoxin motif that targets nAChRs and a region of the S protein of SARS-CoV2 near the furin cleavage site (Fig. 1A)18, increasing attention has been paid to the hypothesis that nAChRs might have some involvement in the clinical manifestations of COVID-1916,19–21. One of them being systemic hyper inflammatory syndrome22. The expression of α7-nAChR subunit in the nervous and immune system has suggested this subunit as a possible target19,23. Much less attention has been given to the α9-nAChR subunit.
The α9-nAChR subunit is found in the pituitary, tongue, olfactory epithelium, and hair cells of the cochlea17. Hence, in a more direct path of contact with the CoV2 virus. Additionally, it has been reported in a variety of native immune cells, including B cells24, and T lymphocytes25, strongly suggesting that they are involved in immunological processes in the respiratory airways. More importantly, α9 nAChRs have been shown to modulate the release of IL-1β26–28.
In order to gain molecular insights on the possible connection of SARS-CoV2 and nAChRs, we studied a panel of co-crystal structures with the neurotoxin binding motif. We found that all the motifs entail a conserved Arginine anchor residue7. Molecular dynamics (MD) of the corresponding sequences confirm that this Arginine is bound-like and exposed to solvent prior to binding, consistent with the expected properties of the motif responsible for molecular recognition7. Strikingly, we found similar structural properties in the intact (pre-cleavage) loop around the conserved R682 in the furin binding site of the S protein of wild-type (WT) SARS-Cov2. Namely, the motif 680SPR682 of S perfectly matches the DPR interacting sites of α-conotoxin bound to α9-nAChR subunit (PDB 6HY7)29. Interestingly, the bound-like motif of R682 is lost after cleavage. Thus, the predicted interaction between S and α9 nAChR should only happen prior to cleavage, i.e., when the virus resides in the respiratory track and nasal mucosa. Of note, this host-pathogen interaction in the furin binding site should prevent cleavage, slowing down cell fusion and viral entry4,14. MDs of the mutated Alpha variant P681H eliminates the structural integrity of the α-conotoxin binding motif by inducing a cation-pi stacking interaction between R681 and H681, which no longer fits in the α9 nAChR binding pocket. In contrast, the Delta variant P681R resuscitates the α-conotoxin binding motif, but the increased flexibility of R681 relative to P681 makes the motif less stable than WT. Finally, Omicron N679K/P681H recapitulates the stacking of H681 and R682, again preventing an interaction with α9 nAChR. While generic nAChR agonists like nicotine, or acetylcholine inhibit IL-1β release, and reduce inflammation17, α9-nAChR antagonists, such as α-conotoxin or the toxin-mimic spike protein of WT, beta, gamma, iota, and to a lesser extent the Delta variant of CoV2, should trigger the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Strikingly, our findings show that both Alpha and Omicron variants block this cholinergic inflammatory pathway. These predictions match closely CDC reported data of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C). Namely, MIS-C drastically diminished during the Alpha variant; a mild wave of cases reappeared when the variant of concern (VOC) was Delta; and, here, we predict that this pathway to inflammation will be fully blocked with Omicron significantly diminishing the risk of MIS-C.
RESULTS
Sequence and structural homology of neurotoxins and furin binding site
As shown by the panel of co-crystal structures in Fig. 1B, the neurotoxin binding motifs entail a conserved Arginine extending away from a loop, which is known to interact with nAChRs. The toxins are stabilized by disulfide bonds, giving rise to relatively stable and potent binding motifs. As expected, MDs show that, even before encountering its receptor30, the toxin motifs acquired their bound-like conformation (Fig. 1C). Of particular interest is the highly stable α-conotoxin that binds α9 nAChR subunit29 (Fig. 2A) because the homology of DPR with 680SPR682 in the spike protein of CoV2 (Fig. 1).
Figure 3A shows the root-mean-square-deviations (RMSD) between MD snapshots of 6 independent concatenated runs totaling more than 2 μs of the DPR binding motif of α-conotoxin and 680SPR682, 680SHR682, 680SRR682, and (K)680SHR682 motifs of WT, Alpha, Delta and Omicron variants, respectively. Although there are no disulfide bonds restraints in the spike furin loop, the WT structure consistently samples the toxin-like α9 nAChR binding motif (Fig. 3B), displaying a remarkable structural and chemical similarity with all the interacting atoms observed in co-crystal (Fig. 2A). Note that the RMSD is almost as accurate as the MDs of the toxin itself in Fig. 1BC. This observation strongly suggests that, like α-conotoxin, the spike protein should readily bind the α9-nAChR subunit. Naturally, the same applies to all the sequences that don’t mutate the furin binding site, i.e., beta, gamma, iota and other variants.
Alpha and Omicron variant P681H no longer fits in α9 nAChR binding pocket
As already mentioned P681 has been mutated by VOC Alpha, Delta and Omicron. A natural question to ask is: what is the impact of these mutations in the α9-nAChR binding motif? To answer this question, we repeated the stability analysis performed for WT, and surprisingly found that both Alpha and Omicron are able to acquire an overall similar structural motif as α-conotoxin (Fig. 3AB). Of note, the dynamics of the binding motif is different than WT, i.e., the bound-like state is stable for somewhat longer time scales. As shown in Fig. 3B, this extra stability arises due to a cation-pi interaction betwen the histidine aromatic ring and R682. As shown in Fig. 2B, this motif does not fit in the pocket between W151 and Y199. We note that W151 is an essential motif of the α9-nAChR binding pocket, and, in general, this side chain has little mobility. Hence, we conclude that neither the Alpha nor the Omicron variant are able to bind the α9 nACh receptor.
The α9-nAChR binding motif reemerges with the Delta mutation P681R
Though less dominant due to extra flexibility surrounding R681, Delta acquires the toxin-like motif for about 16% of the simulation time (Fig. 2A). The most common structural motif, with a RMSD of about 1.3 Å, differs from the toxin motif shown in Fig. 2B on S680 being flipped outwards, which could potentially rearrange after R682 binds in the pocket. Overall, the expectation is that Delta should still be able to engage α9-nAChR, though less effectively than WT.
DISCUSSION
Three years into the COVID-19 pandemic has brought little mechanistic understanding of the inflammatory pathways and cytokine storm triggered by the virus1,2. Here, we provide strong evidence that the physical interaction of the furin binding site of the spike protein of SARS-CoV2 and the α9 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α9-nAChR) should activate the cholinergic inflammatory pathway.
More importantly, α9-nAChR is known to modulate the release of IL-1β, as well as induced (mucosal) IL-631 and other pro-inflammatory cytokines. Transcripts of α9-nAChR have been shown to co-localize17 with the access point of the virus. Therefore, contrary to other nAChRs, the α9 subunit meets the virus in the respiratory track and nasal mucosa.
Remarkable, all variants that do not mutate the region around the furin cleavage site 680SPR682 have a strong sequence and structural similarity with a potent toxin motif (Fig. 3AB) that should readily recognize and bind α9-nAChR. Interactions between the α-conotoxin-mimic CoV2 motif and α9 nAChR are expected to trigger the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This interaction at the furin binding motif should also slow down the cleavage by furin. This is important since it is known that that furin cleavage occurs even during virus packaging4. And, after cleavage, the C-end terminal of S1 that encompass 680SPR682 motif is not only highly immunogenic, but also its structure is no longer compatible a toxin-binding motif capable of binding α9 nAChR (Fig. S1).
The P681H mutation of the Alpha variant keeps a motif similar to α-conotoxin, with the important caveat that the aromatic ring of H681 forms a stacking interaction with R682. This motif no longer fits in the α9-nAChR binding pocket (Fig. 2B), preventing the interaction between the Alpha variant and the cholinergic inflammatory pathway via the α9 subunit. The same behavior is observed for Omicron, whereas Delta partially recovers the toxin binding motif, and, thus, some capacity to trigger this inflammatory pathway. As shown in Fig. 4, our findings accurately track the appearance of these different variants of concern and reported cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children by the CDC. Our findings predict that Omicron has a significantly reduced risk to trigger MIS-C. Of note, the Alpha variant already showed a diminished risk of MIS-C. However, as noted in Fig. 4, the alpha variant always has some overlap with beta, gamma, iota and mu variants that are predicted to engage the cholinergic inflammatory pathway the same as wild-type SARS-CoV2.
Collectively, our findings validate molecular modeling as an approach to probe the host/pathogen interactions. This advance allows us to test the functional impact of past and future mutations by in silico scanning physical interactions. Based on the insights borne out by the structural evolution at the furin cleavage site, we surmise that Omicron eliminated the risk of MIS-C. The ultimate question of whether the N679K/P681H mutations efficiently evade an immune system response, have an unforeseen functional selective pressure, or benefit from simply keeping naive populations available for replication remains to be determined.
METHODS
The initial peptide structures were generated in Pymol. The N- and C-termini were capped with ACE and NHE, respectively, except in peptides of the C-end terminal of S1 that were capped with ACE and -O. The molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were run with pmemd.cuda32–34 from AMBER18 using AMBER ff14SB force field35. We used tLeap binary (part of AMBER18) for solvating the structures in an octahedral TIP3P water box with a 12 Å distance from structure surface to the box edges, and closeness parameter of 0.75 Å. The system was neutralized and solvated in a solution of 150 mM NaCl. Simulations were carried out equilibrating the system for 1 ns at NPT using Berstein barostat to keep constant pressure at 1 atm at 300K, followed by 500 ns NPT production at 300 K, with non-bonded interaction cut off at 10 Å. Hydrogen bonds were constrained using SHAKE algorithm and integration time-step at 2 fs. Analysis of our repeated MDs, indicated that 150 ns was an adequate time for equilibration, and therefore the first 150 ns of all our runs were discarded from the analysis. Clustering and RMSD calculations were generated using Cpptraj36 software. Clusters were calculated considering the largest number of elements around a centroid with a distance less than a reported value (see text).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are grateful for motivating and insightful discussions with Professors Maria Chikina, Dana Ascherman, and Wesley Pedgen. Comments to the MS by Gaby Gerlach and Alex Hammels are acknowledged.